THE failure of a regeneration agency to remotely approach any of its targets on jobs and investments despite the millions poured into it highlights the need to bring quangos into the fold of Government, a think tank has warned.
Reform Scotland said the arm's-length status of Riverside Inverclyde, which met only 7% of its job target of 2600 in seven years, meant it lacked accountability for the £60 million of public cash it has spent to date.
Meanwhile, the umbrella body for Scotland's voluntary sector said Riverside Inverclyde's charitable status represented "a serious threat to the reputation of charities and reflected badly on genuine third sector organisations".
The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations compared the body to the Glasgow East Regeneration Agency, whose chief executive walked away with a near £500,000 pay-off this year.
A leading member of Riverside Inverclyde's board, Inverclyde Council leader Stephen McCabe, said the report was "a fair, balanced and honest assessment of progress made to date".
However, he added: "Scottish Government ministers would not have provided Riverside Inverclyde with tens of millions of pounds of public money if they had not been satisfied it was doing a reasonably good job in an extremely difficult economic climate.
"The chairman and chief executive have met regularly with ministers and civil servants. Riverside Inverclyde's business plans and funding bids have been closely scrutinised and subject to ministerial approval."
It was revealed yesterday that a mid-term review found the cost per job created by the arms-length agency has been £321,000.
Since 2006, it has built just 5% of the 2285 new homes promised, while also securing 1% of the private sector investment it said would be levered from the £60m it received from the public purse.
Land bought at James Watt Docks in Greenock for millions is so contaminated it means the site has little or negative value.
Two leading officials, chief executive Bill Nicol and implementation manager Garry Williamson, have left or are due to leave.
Alison Payne, research director of Reform Scotland, said: "If bodies like Riverside Inverclyde were inside government, then politicians and ministers could be held properly accountable for the decisions they took and the outcomes they achieved.
Similarly, a fully autonomous body could be scrutinised for the contracts it signs in return for taxpayers money.
"Too many quangos are spending significant sums without proper public accountability."
Felix Spittal, SCVO policy officer, said: "Millions have been wasted on this pseudo-charity when genuine charities like Inverclyde Community Development Trust are delivering the type of ... regeneration accepted as the key to success."
SNP MSP for West of Scotland Stuart McMillan said that while Labour complained about SNP Government funding "now we see its mismanagement has resulted in these disappointing figures". However, Mr McCabe called for parties to work together.
The Scottish Government said the review was a matter for Riverside Inverclyde's board.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article