Over 60% of people do not think SNP leader Alex Salmond and his party have made a convincing case for independence so far, according to a poll.
Figures released today by Better Together, the group campaigning to keep Scotland in the UK, show that 62% of people surveyed said the SNP's case for independence is either "not very convincing'' or "not convincing at all''.
More than a fifth of those respondents were people who claimed to have voted for the Nationalists in the Scottish and UK parliamentary elections - 24% and 22% respectively.
The poll, carried out by YouGov for Better Together, surveyed a total of 1,038 Scottish adults this week.
It found that 30% of those asked are convinced by what they have heard from the SNP so far, with 11% saying the case for independence is "very convincing" and 19% responding that it is "fairly convincing".
Respondents also highlighted the issues they believe will be important in deciding how they vote in the referendum, which is to be held on September 18 next year.
In a question which allowed them to choose up to three options, the main issues raised were: the economy (59%), tax and spending levels (39%), pensions and welfare (36%), health services (30%) and currency (22%).
Better Together leader Alistair Darling said: "Whether on Europe, Nato, currency or pensions, the Nationalists have been exposed as being dishonest and disorganised on their preparations for independence.
"The SNP have no answers on basic questions like which currency we would use or who would pay for our pensions. Their case is falling apart day by day.''
A spokesman for Yes Scotland said: "The evidence is clear that Scotland would be more prosperous as an independent country with the means and the will to be a fairer country too.
"We will continue to press the positive and optimistic case for an independent Scotland which we firmly believe will win the day on September 18 next year.
"It makes sense for us to have the powers we need to match our priorities and aspirations while maintaining a strong social union with the rest of the UK.''
Labour MSP Patricia Ferguson said the poll was a blow for the SNP.
"It reaffirms that Scots simply don't trust what they hear from Salmond and Sturgeon,'' she said.
"The SNP change their mind on the currency question more often than the weather changes. People are rightly questioning whether they're simply making it up as they go along.''
Commenting on the poll, SNP campaign director Angus Robertson said: "Polling already shows that a clear majority of Scots want all tax and spending, welfare and pensions to be decided by the Scottish Parliament.
"They also support keeping the pound post-independence - which Darling also called 'desirable and logical'.
"All this poll proves is that the No campaign is being led by what the Tory Government says - a fact which will haunt their campaign.''
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: "People need to see clear and credible answers from the Nationalists on their plans for tax, pensions and the welfare system in an independent Scotland.
"It simply isn't credible to continue to roll out the stock accusation of scaremongering in the face of legitimate concerns from people across Scotland."
Conservative deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said Mr Salmond was "making it up as he goes along".
"It is staggering to think that with just 17 months to the referendum vote the SNP is clueless on so many fundamental issues, such as what currency we would have in our pockets under separation," he said.
"Alex Salmond thinks he can bluff his way to next year's vote by pretending everything will be the same under independence.
"But people remain unconvinced with his flimsy arguments that separation would somehow allow Scotland to still keep the pound, be a member of Nato and be fast-tracked into the EU."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article