THE head of BBC Scotland's newsroom has been attacked by one of his former journalists over his connections to Labour in the run up to next year's independence referendum.
John Boothman, the head of news, has come under fire from retired broadcaster Derek Bateman who said in his blog that his strong past links to the pro-United Kingdom party are a liability in today's Scotland.
Mr Bateman wrote of Mr Boothman, whose partner is the former Labour health minister Susan Deacon: "John Boothman was a clear asset to the BBC at that time because of his Labour connections. They were key to his career and were valued by all. He had the respect of all sides throughout his career as a producer.
"But I felt from the outset that in the febrile air of today's Scotland with so many political knives being sharpened, it was a risk to appoint as head of news someone around whom the perception of affiliation hung."
Mr Bateman is also critical of Mr Boothman's management role.
He added that he was determined to speak up about Mr Boothman, but as a former colleague "it still stings me personally to expose him".
He added: "I do so because complaining internally is proven to be useless and because when you reach executive level certain protocols are required, certain behaviour is expected.
"He has executive authority to affect the lives of staff and when that is used as ruthlessly as he has in ending the careers of friends and colleagues, he loses the right to loyalty."
Mr Bateman, a former Herald journalist, presented the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme for 10 years and the Saturday current affairs review Newsweek Scotland. He reported from Brussels and Strasbourg for the BBC, and on the Troubles and worked around the world, covering two US presidential elections.
Mr Bateman's blogs have recently made headlines,with some of his observations making uncomfortable reading for senior figures at BBC Scotland.
A BBC source indicated last night: "Social media allows people to express a wide range of personal views on organisations, including the BBC, but we don't provide a running commentary every time that happens."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article