SPECULATION is mounting that the referendum on Scottish independence will be held on the 700th anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn.
Reports yesterday said the SNP wants to use the anniversary of Scotland's most famous victory over the English, on June 24, 1314, to tap into nationalist fervour.
It also coincides with the 2014 Commonwealth Games and Ryder Cup at Gleneagles.
The SNP last night refused to confirm or deny the speculation, simply saying it would be held in the second half of the current parliament.
A referendum bill is likely to be introduced to Holyrood towards the end of this year or the start of 2013.
Reports quoted senior SNP figures as claiming "nothing was set in stone" but "autumn 2014 is shaping up to be the target date for the referendum".
Other party sources claimed Labour and the LibDems "look set to fall into a trap of their own making by campaigning with the Tories against any more powers for Scotland".
Despite noises on a united front to preserve the Union, the main parties are divided on what to offer as an alternative.
New Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont has indicated she is opposed to sharing a campaign with the Tories. She said: "The SNP needs to act maturely and set the referendum date once and for all to end this unnecessary uncertainty. They should start acting in the interests of Scotland – not just themselves."
Willie Rennie, of the Liberal Democrats, said: "The SNP should be answering questions on the cost of splitting Scotland from the UK."
An SNP spokeswoman said: "We will do exactly as we said we would in the election – hold the referendum in the second half of this parliament, based on the resounding mandate we received from the people of Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article