HEALTH inequalities are the biggest issue facing Scotland today and require a "pan-societal" response from all levels of the public sector, the country's top doctor has warned.
The inequalities are "astonishingly complex" and MSPs and others must show the political will to deliver consistent and nationally scaled solutions to make a difference over the coming decade, Chief Medical Officer for Scotland Sir Harry Burns said.
Sir Harry was giving evidence to Holyrood's Public Audit Committee on a report into health inequalities by Audit Scotland. The report found that despite general improvements in health, deep-seated differences remain between the least and most deprived communities.
It found that it is not clear how, at local level, resources are targeted to the areas with the greatest need, while health spending actually tends to lead to greater benefits for richer areas.
Sir Harry said the report would have been "really helpful" 20 years ago. He said, however, it did not pay much attention to the "complex science" that underlies inequalities. "For me, health inequalities are the biggest issue facing Scotland just now, because not only are health inequalities a problem, but they are a manifestation of social inequalities and social disintegration that drives things like criminality, like poor educational attainment, and a whole range of things that we would like to be different," he said.
He said a "pan-societal" response was needed.
Conservative MSP Mary Scanlon said Audit Scotland had looked at Government strategies aimed at improving health since 2008 but the public spending watchdog had not found robust evidence of their effects.
Sir Harry said the projects are being done "piecemeal" and would have to be scaled to a much greater level. "This is not something that is going to change overnight," he said. "It will take stick-ability and doing it for five to 10 years, and then we will see a difference."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article