A SCOTTISH doctor has spoken out about the over-prescribing of antidepressants, saying they have been handed out "too easily for too long".
In an article in the BMJ medical journal, likely to spark controversy, Glasgow GP Des Spence argues treating depression like a medical condition is distracting attention from what really makes patients unhappy.
He describes the diagnostic criteria for depression as two weeks of low mood, irrespective of any change in the circumstances of the patient which might have left them feeling down.
Dr Spence writes: "It even proposes that being low two weeks after bereavement should be considered depression."
He admits his comments are likely to rattle psychiatrists and says their defensiveness was stifling legitimate discussion about antidepressant use. Dr Spence adds: "As a generalist prescribing antidepressants daily in primary care, I think we use antidepressants too easily, for too long and that they are effective for few people (if at all).
"But even questioning current care is considered stigmatising towards mental illness and populist anti-medicine rhetoric."
The number of people in Scotland prescribed antidepressants has reached record levels, with more than one in seven people taking the drugs.
There has been a steady rise in usage. There were 1.26 million drugs dispensed in 1993/94, increasing to 5.01 million in 2011/12. The cost to the NHS in Scotland last year was £31.3 million.
As well as exposing patients to medication, with potential side effects, Dr Spence's key concern about the widespread use of antidepressants is they leave the real reason for someone's poor mood unexplained.
He said: "Improving society's wellbeing is not in the gift of medicine nor mere medication, and over-prescribing of antidepressants serves as distraction from a wider debate about why we are so unhappy as a society."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article