A major wing of the New Victoria Hospital, Glasgow, which was built under a controversial private finance scheme, remains closed to patients after weaknesses were identified with the water treatment plant used in kidney dialysis treatment.
The equipment is needed to purify the water used during dialysis of certain toxins that can be harmful to renal patients, but an independent report found that the plant would quickly become out-of-date and unable to support advancements in treatment.
A decision was taken not to open the renal unit along with the rest of the hospital, and frustration is growing among patient groups about a lack of information regarding the delay.
Andrew Allison, of the Scottish Kidney Federation, said: “This is a large area of concern for us, particularly when you consider the amount of money that has been spent on the facilities which are not being used. It is the patient who is being short-changed.”
The renal unit is designed to take about 100 dialysis patients from the city’s Gartnavel and Stobhill hospitals.
Margaret Hinds, chairwoman of the Health Service Forum South East, said: “The issues with the renal unit are extremely disappointing. It is not as if dialysis is new. It doesn’t fill me with a feeling of security when you have these problems at a hospital of this size when the Southern General has not yet been finished.”
A spokeswoman for Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS said that the New Victoria Hospital has treated “many thousands” of patients since it opened in June with “high levels of satisfaction”.
She said: “Of all the different services offered locally at the hospital, the renal dialysis service is the only one which has not been introduced according to the timescales in the original plan.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article