SCOTS outdoors enthusiasts are being warned to be extra vigilant against tick bites after a herbicide ban raised concerns that the insects' population is likely to soar.
The number of cases of Lyme disease – a potentially debilitating condition transmitted by ticks – has already risen from 28 in 2001 to 308 in 2010, but an EU ban on the herbicide Asulam has left nature watchers fearful that the increase in infections could accelerate.
Asulam is used to control the spread of bracken which provides a perfect habitat for ticks. It was withdrawn from sale at the end of 2011 and its use will be prohibited from December this year.
Lyme disease is transmitted via the bite of an infected tick and can lead to complications, including damage to the nervous system and heart.
Tick-borne disease charity BADA-UK has now expressed fears that the Asulam ban will lead to a rise in cases of the disease.
The charity's patron, survival expert Ray Mears said: "The spread of bracken as a result of the Asulam ban will lead to increased tick numbers making it all the more important that the public takes precautions against tick bites when out and about in rural areas."
Wendy Fox, chairwoman of BADA-UK, was left disabled as a result of Lyme disease. She said: "Increased interest in outdoor pursuits, combined with an increasing tick population is resulting in a year-on-year rise in cases of tick-borne disease."
The charity is backing a Scots research firm which is seeking hillwalkers to help them assess whether there would be a market for a device which removes ticks. Roslin-based Xeroshield is looking to develop the gadget.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article