GPs will hand over some key duties to health boards under plans to free them up to spend more time with elderly patients.
Proposals are being considered which may mean family doctors in Scotland no longer employ their own practice staff and pass on jobs such as ensuring patients with long term conditions are regularly monitored.
The planned shake-up by Scottish ministers and the British Medical Association comes as GP surgeries face a recruitment crisis - with a survey earlier this year finding 17 per cent are short of at least one doctor.
It would fundamentally change a key element of their current contract where practices receive points, and funding, for delivering a range of goals such as keeping blood pressure down in high risk patients, reviewing asthma sufferers and offering smokers support to quit.
It is envisaged that the new health and social care boards which are taking over responsibility for running community services will assume responsibility for delivering such goals.
Dr Alan McDevitt, chair of the British Medical Association's Scottish GP Committee (SGPC) and a central player in the negotiations, said: "The reason we are doing this is all about making sure we free-up GP time not just for more appointments but also because the complex care we have to do for elderly patients means 10 minute appointments are not long enough. We have to start preparing for the future (with more elderly patients). We need to make sure we can give more time to older patients with complex conditions."
The Glasgow GP admitted the re-organisation would not be easy, saying: "We are in a difficult financial time. We do not have enough GPs and there are a lot of things that could go wrong."
However, he said the BMA and the Scottish Government have been travelling the country gathering views on how to address the issues in a way which works for patients and doctors and attracts young medics back into the profession.
Dr McDevitt said: "One of the concerns that frequently comes up is this could damage continuity of care. If it does we have failed. There are all sorts of challenges, but I think it is about getting a general practice that is right for patients and right for doctors."
He strongly denied it would lead to some jobs, like that of practice managers and receptionists, being centralised. He said: "We are absolutely clear that this is about sustaining local practices and bringing staff in to give people services back closer to their homes and relationship based care, but in the modern world."
In some areas, health boards have been forced to step in and take over the running of surgeries which collapsed because vacancies for doctors could not be filled.
Shona Robison, Scottish Health Secretary, addressed an audience of GPs in Edinburgh this week at an event organised by the medical magazine Pulse. She called the ideas on the table "compelling".
In an article in its online edition, she describes the proposals as "quite different" to the current set up. She also said: "We have had this discussion... about moving away from the kind of gatekeeper role of general practice to a model of primary care being a wider health team, with GPs being the clinical experts.
"That's something that I know the BMA and the Royal College of General Practitioners have said is a more sustainable model."
The last time GPs signed a radically different contract was in 2004 when they gave up responsibility for looking after patients outside surgery hours. NHS 24 took over answering calls to GP surgeries during evenings and weekends and hit crisis as it could not cope with demand.
The new proposals are part of a new contract for Scottish GPs due to be implemented in 2017. They are being discussed at a BMA conference in London this week and consultation is expected to continue into the summer.
A government spokesman said: "We're working closely with the SGPC of the BMA and others, including the RCGP, to discuss ideas for the future of general practice in Scotland. The Scottish Government remains open to new ideas from all key stakeholders." He added that the process was at an early stage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article