Radioactive discharges from the Dounreay nuclear plant in Caithness triggered a fierce row with Norway in 1990, according to official files just released by the Scottish Government.
Norwegian ministers made strong representations to the UK Government in protest at discharges that they said threatened their fishing industry. This prompted a flurry of memos within the UK Government, expressing concerns that the UK wasn't doing enough to refute the Norwegian accusations.
Malcolm Rifkind, the Conservative Secretary of State for Scotland at the time, wrote to the British ambassador in Oslo, David Ratford, agreeing that more "pre-emptive action" should be taken.
"By its very nature the subject of radioactive waste attracts biased and inaccurate media coverage, which results in the creation of widespread concern both at home and abroad," he wrote. "We should certainly do what we can to minimise that."
Rifkind was backed by a senior Foreign Office official, who complained that "we have often found ourselves reacting to Norwegian criticism", and said that the Government seemed to lack the necessary information to counter the criticisms.
He claimed the "propaganda" put out by anti-nuclear groups was "scientifically illiterate", but would be widely publicised "and we must take positive steps to counter it".
One proposal was to invite the Norwegian environment minister, Kristin Hille Valla, to visit Dounreay. But this would leave her "open to the temptation to play to the environment and anti-nuclear constituencies here", warned a cable from Ratford in August 1990.
He urged postponing any invitation to Halla on the grounds that her position in the Norwegian government was insecure, and she could be the casualty of any reshuffle.
BY ROB EDWARDS
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article