An internal report from Scotland's environment watchdog, warning of a "high risk" of water pollution from drilling for underground gas, has been seized on by objectors in the run-up to a major public inquiry opening this week.
The report, written by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa), reveals that a flawed and potentially leaky gas borehole was planned at Cumbernauld close to exploratory water-wells dug by the makers of Irn-Bru, AG Barr, and the sausage skin manufacturer, Devro. There was also "poor borehole construction" at Canonbie, in Dumfriesshire.
Environmentalists and community groups say the food industry's reputation is under threat from the dash to exploit unconventional gas in Scotland. They are preparing to fight plans, at a public inquiry starting on Tuesday, for the UK's first commercial drilling for coalbed methane in Falkirk and Stirling.
The Sepa report, marked "internal only", was written by experts for its Water and Land Policy and Regulatory Support Group and was released under freedom of information laws. "The construction of deep boreholes presents a high risk to the water environment," it says.
Vertical and horizontal drilling for gas down to 2500m poses a greater danger of pollution than boreholes for water, which are mostly less than 100m deep, it argues. Deep saline waters can contaminate more drinkable upper aquifers "if the borehole is not adequately constructed".
The report also points out that "fracking fluids", which could be used to help extract methane, must "not be allowed to leak into other parts of the groundwater system". No fracking - the hydraulic fracturing of underground rock - is currently proposed in Scotland, though critics fear it will come soon.
The Sepa report discloses "poor borehole construction" planned at Deerdykes near Cumbernauld. The borehole would have been lined with cement only down to 100m and risked contaminating test wells dug in the vicinity by AG Barr and Devro, it suggests.
Both firms said they were no longer planning to use water from the wells. AG Barr said it had tested the water at Deerdykes and, though it was suitable for use as spring water, there was not enough to meet its needs.
"Any potential future drilling activity in the Deerdykes area related to coalbed methane or shale gas exploration will therefore have no impact on the quality of our products," said a Barr spokesman.
A spokeswoman for Devro said: "Devro do not use water extracted from a well and have no plans to do so."
Sepa pointed out that the Deerdykes borehole had not been drilled as planned, and had now been granted a licence aimed at ensuring it would protect human health. The developer, Reach Coal Seam Gas, said it had changed the design of the borehole to follow industry "best practice" guidelines.
According to Sepa, four gas boreholes in Canonbie lacked cement lining between 100m and 400m, potentially allowing contamination of an aquifer. Sepa says it has toughened its regulations, and is requiring current owner, Dart Energy, to take remedial action.
Dart, which acquired the Canonbie boreholes in 2012, is also the developer proposing to exploit coalbed methane in Falkirk and Stirling. "Dart has had constructive discussions with Sepa throughout, and has recently finalised arrangements with Sepa to allow Dart to plug, abandon and reinstate [the Canonbie wells]," said a company spokesman.
Mary Church, head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth Scotland, described the concerns raised by Sepa as serious. She pointed out that a coal gas firm in Australia had last month been fined $1500 for contaminating an aquifer with uranium 20 times higher than safe drinking guidelines.
"Unconventional gas is a novel industry in Scotland, and we could end up being the UK's guinea pigs," she said.
Dr Mark Williams, of Concerned Communities of Falkirk who lives close to one of the planned drill sites, said Sepa was too poorly resourced to ensure water was not polluted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article