Controversial plans to build the world's first gas carbon capture development in Scotland have been given the green light.
Up to 10 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions could soon be captured from Peterhead Power Station and transported by a pipeline offshore for long-term storage deep under the North Sea.
Proposals to build the onshore site along with a control room, waste water plant and substations were discussed at an Aberdeenshire Council meeting yesterday.
The plans were backed by councillors in Aberdeen with full planning permission granted.
Shell and SSE are in the running for UK funding to develop the scheme which would capture one million tonnes of CO2 a year for 10 to 15 years.
The gas would be transported through new and existing pipelines and finally injected into a depleted gas reservoir more than two kilometres under the sea bed where it will be permanently stored.
Emissions from one of the existing gas turbines at the power station will be captured and CO2 will be separated from other gasses.
Yesterday Bill Spence, who leads the project for Shell, said: "This is encouraging news and follows an intense 12-month period of comprehensive planning and design work by the team here in Aberdeen.
"Progressing the project with the backing of the community is important to us and this outcome is a strong indication of local support. This project would create jobs, put existing industry skills and infrastructure to good use and demonstrate a technology critical for decarbonising the power sector."
The project is part of the UK Government's CCS Comercialisation Competition. Starting construction depends on a positive investment decision from Shell and the government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article