MANY secondary schools in Scotland are ignoring official guidance on the introduction of the controversial new curriculum, a survey has found.
The poll of 180 schools by the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association (SSTA) found 45% are still allowing pupils to choose exam subjects at the end of second year.
The move runs counter to the intentions of the new Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) which seeks to give pupils a broad-based education until the end of S3.
It is only then they are supposed to choose which subjects they will sit under the new National 4 and National 5 exams – which replace Standard Grades and Intermediates.
Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, has already spoken out over the issue after a decision by East Renfrewshire to allow S2 pupils to choose subjects.
However, the council believes making early choices will preserve the breadth of subject choice – and better prepare pupils for Higher exams.
Ann Ballinger, general secretary of the SSTA, said: "Perhaps the solution is to go back to the ethos of CfE and allow schools to decide what is best for them and their pupils."
Mr Russell said: "I would hope schools are listening very carefully to the advice and assistance they are getting so they can ensure the advantages of CfE are being delivered.
"There is widespread support in schools for the model that is being supported nationally and that is what will be implemented."
East Renfrewshire decided to allow all of its schools to delay implementation for a year, and wants most pupils to continue to choose subjects in S2.
Mr Russell has previously said he was prepared to treat East Renfrewshire as a "special case" during the transition to the new exams.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article