SECONDARY school subject choice is one of main mechanisms used by sharp-elbowed middle class parents to push their offspring on to the flight path to the world's top jobs, according to a study by a Scottish university.
Researchers studied the "occupational outcomes" of nearly 10,000 people who were in secondary school between 1969 and 1976 - a time when traditional selective state education and grammar schools were being swept away in favour of what Tony Blair's spokesman Alastair Campbell later called "bog standard comprehensives".
The findings showed that the curriculum choices a child made at 16 were much more important than the type of school they attended in determining the social status attained several decades later.
The analysis, carried out at Edinburgh University's Moray House School of Education and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, also found that going to an independent or a grammar school did not always give advantages.
It was found to explain "a small proportion of the social inequalities". Taken together, subject choice and school type accounted for between a quarter and a third of the advantage associated with growing up in a middle-class family.
The researchers found those from more advantaged social backgrounds were more likely to study a larger number of courses in subjects such as languages, English, maths and science - and to attend selective schools - which were found to enhance the chances of entering professional and managerial occupations.
Another finding showed subject choices explained the effect of attending grammar and independent schools that could not be explained by the social composition and ability of the students attending.
Dr Cristina Iannelli, senior lecturer at Moray House, said: "This study uncovers subject choice as one of the mechanisms by which middle-class parents were able to put their children on to the right path leading to the top occupational destinations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article