SECULARISTS have launched a last ditch bid for new guidance to be introduced to outlaw the promotion of young earth creationism in schools.
Last year, the Scottish Secularist Society (SSS) petitioned MSPs to urge the Scottish Government to bar the "presentation" of young earth doctrines as viable alternatives to the established science of evolution in the classroom.
The SSS believes schools are being subjected to what they describe as an "attack" on established scientific theories from imported US doctrines known as creation science and intelligent design.
However, School Leaders' Scotland (SLS), which represents secondary headteachers, the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), the country's largest teaching union, and the Scottish Government all wrote to the committee outlining their objections.
These organisations backed the long-standing principle that protection from extremist views in Scottish education relies on the professionalism of teaching staff and the regulatory role of bodies such as local authorities, the General Teaching Council for Scotland and the schools inspectorate.
However, in a new submission to the public petitions committee the SSS said sufficient safeguards were not in place and creationism was "institutionalised".
It said: "Inaction will be seen, as it has already been seen, by creationists worldwide as a licence to continue their activities, causing damage to Scottish education, and to Scotland's proud reputation for the advancement of knowledge, on which so much of our economic future depends."
Professor Paul Braterman, SSS board member and scientific advisor, added: "The problem of embedded creationism within Scottish education can no longer be ignored.
"The Government says it has no present plans to issue guidance, but given the evidence that we have presented, and the interest that the issue has aroused, we hope they will think again."
However, the EIS reiterated its view that legislative "interference" was unnecessary because teachers were already aware of their responsibilities.
A spokesman said: "We are confident that our members would not support any set of beliefs which would undermine the current curricular guidance in science or in religious education, and procedures are already in place to deal with any potential issues.
"As such, we would question the evidence base for the claim that the teaching of young earth creationism is embedded' in schools - this is contrary to the collective experience of our members, the teachers who work every day in schools across Scotland."
Ken Cunningham, general secretary of SLS also criticised the SSS petition, arguing schools were fully aware of the need to protect pupils from "extremist" views.
Tim Simons, head of curriculum at the Scottish Government's learning directorate, previously wrote to the parliament's petitions committee saying there were no plans to introduce new guidance.
He said: "I can confirm that there are no plans to issue guidance to schools or education authorities to prevent the presentation of creationism, intelligent design or similar doctrines by teachers or school visitors. The evidence available suggests that guidance on these matters is unnecessary.
"However, Education Scotland will continue to monitor, through the school inspection process and by other means, any instances where schools are not ensuring the teaching of science is based on well-established science and scientific principles."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article