A DISABLED schoolboy has won a landmark ruling that he can take part in after-school guitar classes after he was refused permission because of his condition.
Thousands of other youngsters with disabilities are expected to benefit following the ruling in the discrimination case against South Lanarkshire Council.
Thomas Pettigrew, 10, a pupil at St Hilary's Primary School in East Kilbride, had a guitar bought for him by his parents so he could take part in the sessions, and they asked the local authority to provide him with additional support, including for assistance in using the toilet and other personal care and moving and holding his guitar.
Thomas, who has several chronic conditions that have a significant effect on his ability to carry out normal daily activities, needs help to adjust his guitar, take it in and out of its case, and turn the sheet music. However, he can hold and play the instrument and use large-print music sheets.
South Lanarkshire refused the Pettigrews' request, claiming sufficient support was in place.
An additional support needs tribunal ruled it should not have denied Thomas the chance to participate.
The case, the first of its kind in Scotland, has been welcomed by human rights campaigners for establishing that inclusion should not "end with the school bell" and that extra-curricular activities are covered by equalities laws.
The Equality Act requires schools to make reasonable adjustments to avoid substantial disadvantage to any disabled pupil.
Due to additional support already provided by South Lanarkshire Council, Thomas has been able to take part fully in the school curriculum, and some extra-curricular activities such as a trip to the theatre.
In finding South Lanarkshire had unlawfully discriminated against Thomas because of his disability, the tribunal considered guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission on making reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils.
They found it had not met the duty to make reasonable adjustments and that Thomas was "substantially disadvantaged" from engaging in the club, adding: "His health and safety is compromised as a result. His additional support needs are not met.'
Iain Nisbet, head of education law at Govan Law Centre, which represented Thomas, said: "We are very pleased to have this early confirmation that a school's duties extend to after-school activities and that Thomas will now be able to take part in the guitar club.
"This ruling could not be more clear: the duty of inclusion for disabled pupils does not end when the bell rings at the end of the school day."
Thomas's mother, Catherine Pettigrew said, "Thomas has always been able to participate in mainstream education and school-related activities, just the same as other children, so he was very distressed when he couldn't participate in the guitar club – he felt that he was being left behind, that he was being excluded, which is very difficult for a 10-year-old.
"All he wanted to do was learn to play the guitar.
"It is important that Thomas can now learn to do something he loves, just like his friends, and also that other parents know that this type of support is available to them."
A spokesperson for South Lanarkshire Council said: "The council always strives to provide all the support that our young people need to participate fully in both curricular and extra-curricular activities. That includes strenuous efforts to ensure there is no 'substantial disadvantage' to disabled pupils.
"In this instance it was felt that the support provided was appropriate and offered a 'reasonable adjustment' that allowed Thomas to participate in the guitar club.
"The council is now reflecting on the findings of the tribunal and considering its position and legal options."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article