A SCOTTISH college involved in a row over bonuses to senior staff has been heavily criticised for the management culture at one of its campuses.
James Watt College is under fire for paying 11 members of its senior team up to £5000 extra each. Now it has been described in a report as having a stressful, disorganised and badly led structure in place at its site in Kilwinning in North Ayrshire.
Even members of the institution's own management team described the college as badly led in the survey of staff, and also described the prevailing culture as unimaginative.
A review was carried out to assess the prevailing cultures in three colleges as they move towards merger under plans for a new Ayrshire College.
It is for these plans that the large bonuses were paid to James Watt's senior team based at its main campus in Greenock, Inverclyde.
Ayr College fared slightly better in the study, but its staff labelled it stressful and uncaring. Kilmarnock College workers in Ayrshire said the college was well led, with high standards.
The report states: "In particular, Kilmarnock respondents seem particularly positive and James Watt particularly critical."
The report goes on: "It is very clear from this that, while managers at Ayr and Kilmarnock see their colleges very positively, this is not the case with management at James Watt.
"Teaching staff at all three colleges see their college as presenting a stressful environment. However, at James Watt this appears to be compounded by perceptions of disorganisation."
The survey also found only 15% of staff trusted their senior management team at James Watt, which until recently was led by principal Sue Pinder, while just 14% of middle managers agreed with the statement: "I trust the senior staff leading the college."
The report comes just days after The Herald revealed that James Watt, which has its headquarters in Greenock, Inverclyde, was under fire after sanctioning bonus payments to senior staff worth a total of almost £60,000.
The payments were for work carried out to help set up the new merged college in Ayrshire and Inverclyde.
A spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland teaching union said the latest report identified serious concerns about the management culture in the colleges involved.
"The evidence shows that, in general, college employees trusted their colleagues and their immediate line-managers, but had very low levels of trust in the senior management," he said.
"For both Ayr College and James Watt College the trust in senior managers was extremely low and this is a very troubling situation which highlights the serious concerns staff had over the way their colleges were managed."
Dr Derek Little, chairman of the board of James Watt, questioned the methodology of the survey and said staff had been unsettled by the merger process.
"I am pleased that, overall, it appears very positive and I am sure it will help the new management team of the soon-to-be-created Ayrshire College to focus on priorities," he said.
"I am surprised, however, at the use of methodology that easily lends itself to manipulation and abuse, which I'm sure would be acknowledged by all involved.
"Also, it is hardly surprising that the raw data would appear to show that some members of staff at James Watt are uncertain and fearful about the future – after all, of all colleges in Scotland, theirs is the only one being torn in two by the regionalistion process and the only one which will be unrecognisable in the new set-up."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article