PRIMARY schools should be provided with a national bank of tests as part of moves to close the attainment gap, according to a leading academic.
More than three-quarters of Scottish councils currently purchase standardised tests from England to identify how well pupils are progressing because similar resources are not available north of the Border.
Professor Sue Ellis, from Strathclyde University's school of education and the Joseph Rowntree research charity, said she supported standardised tests - but stressed pupils across the country should not be required to sit the same tests at the same time to avoid the compilation of league tables.
The intervention comes after the reintroduction of controversial national standardised tests was suggested as a way of improving standards, despite the fact critics argue the simply encourage school staff to "teach to the test".
Giving evidence to the Scottish Parliament's education committee, Professor Ellis said: "Having a national bank of surveys and tests which schools can decide when and which years they are going to test and how they are going to use that information... is actually one of the most useful things that you can do.
"We need a national banks of surveys and tests that schools can call on because you don't want to see that much money just walking south of the Border to buy things we could provide more cheaply and more responsively."
The call came as the committee took evidence on the Scottish Government's Education (Scotland) Bill which will place a statutory duty on councils to report to Holyrood on the progress they are making on closing the attainment gap every two years.
Iain Glennie, a professional officer with the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, backed the legislation, but said greater levels of resources were needed.
However, Keir Bloomer, an advisory member of the Reform Scotland think tank, said the legislation would have a "negligible" impact on closing the attainment gap.
He said: "We will get lots of bureaucratic action, we will get lots of reports, most of them in competition with each other trying to demonstrate huge quantities of activity, but that is not, after all, the purpose of what is being put forward.
"What is being put forward is basically a statement of aspiration and looking through the evidence the only argument in favour of putting such an aspiration into law is that it will help to raise awareness, but that is addressing a problem we do not have.
"Scotland has been aware of this problem for the best part of half a century, successive governments in good faith have made all kinds of initiatives to tackle it but the success achieved has so far been negligible."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article