COUNCILS have accused the Scottish Government of reneging on a deal over the way schools will be supported in future.
The row centres on the creation of “regional collaboratives” intended to provide more consistent support to schools across council boundaries.
The original plans were seen as a threat to local authorities because they deliberately sidelined council officials and were to be run by independent directors reporting to the chief inspector of schools at Education Scotland.
However, a deal was struck between John Swinney, the Education Secretary, and Stephen McCabe, Cosla’s education spokesman, which saw the power of regional directors significantly reduced.
However, Cosla, the umbrella body for councils, believes a new Scottish Government consultation on the collaboratives poses a new threat because it suggests councils would no longer produce their own improvement plans for schools.
Its submission states: “We are extremely disappointed and concerned the proposals in relation to regional improvement collaboratives undermine the agreement between the Scottish Government and Cosla.
“The agreement was clear that improvement collaboratives would complement the role of local authorities. This consultation suggests replacement, not collaboration.
“The suggestion that a local authority would no longer be required to produce an improvement plan ... bypasses the importance of a local authority’s role in improvement and undermines the agreement.”
There are currently six collaboratives – led by regional lead officers – through which Scotland’s 32 local authorities will combine to support schools.
The regional lead officers are responsible for producing an improvement plan in consultation with schools and headteachers.
Scottish Government and Education Scotland officials will meet with each collaborative to support the planning process.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel