AN overwhelming majority of headteachers do not support plans to enshrine a new Headteachers’ Charter in legislation.
A survey of nearly 400 headteachers and deputes by Scotland’s largest teaching union found 88 per cent opposed a legal status for the charter.
Instead, members of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) believe it should be backed up by written guidance.
Overall, the EIS poll found only 43 per cent of those surveyed supported the creation of a Headteachers’ Charter at all.
The charter - part of a new Education Bill - will give more powers to headteachers to shape the curriculum, decide on how funding is allocated and select staff.
Criticism from individual EIS members highlighted a number of concerns including increased bureaucracy and workload.
One EIS member said: “I fear the charter is a simplistic and populist response to complex challenges.
“It is in danger, in my view, of placing yet further pressures of accountability on headteachers who are already subject to a huge accountability agenda.
“I would be concerned about a significant addition of responsibility placed on headteachers who are already overstretched due to cuts in essential services.”
The EIS submission went on to criticise the focus placed through the charter on the role of the headteacher.
The union said: “Such an approach, which echoes an heroic leadership model, is at odds with everything that Scotland has being trying to achieve as it fails to advance the notion of ... leadership at all levels.
“The EIS would argue that rather than focussing so singularly on the formal role of headteacher the proposals should be seeking to entitle and empower teachers and schools more collectively.
“It should be noted too that evidence has emerged that the heroic model of leadership often results in short term results that are unsustainable, particularly when the “successful” hero is headhunted for their next challenge.”
Overall, the EIS warned the government’s plans to move power away from councils could undermine the system of comprehensive schools.
The concerns were echoed by the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association (SSTA), which called for the name to be changed.
The SSTA submission states: “Staff, pupils, parents and the wider school community must all be part of this collegiate leadership.
“Perhaps it would be more appropriate to have a schools charter given that the intention is empowering schools.”
However, School Leaders Scotland, which represents secondary headteachers, welcomed the government’s approach.
Its response states: “Given the fast moving and rapidly changing nature of the workplace we would value ... the power to introduce and remove areas of study from the curriculum to better enable it to meet the needs, interests and aspirations of young people.
“We fully support the removal of the practice of recruitment of staff by mass interview and their allocation to schools from a centralised pool.
“We would welcome the opportunity to enter into discussion in regard of adding rigor to the process of challenging under-performance.”
However, the body goes on to call for the new beefed up role for heads to be reflected in higher salaries - with support from new administrative and financial staff.
It said: “Every school leader must have the support of an appropriately qualified, trained and financially remunerated business support manager or bursar.
“We would expect to be involved in a significant review of salary levels, and see a commitment to a complete overhaul of the salary structures for school leaders.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel