Strikes at 61 universities are “much more likely” to go ahead after talks over potential changes to pensions ended without an agreement between unions and employers, the University and College Union (UCU) has said.
Lectures, classes and exams could be hit if UCU pushes ahead with industrial action, beginning with a two-day walkout next month, due to the ongoing dispute.
The union had earlier announced that its members had overwhelmingly backed action over proposed changes to pensions covered by the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) in an industrial ballot.
Around 61 universities could face disruption if UCU pushes ahead with industrial action (Peter Byrne/PA)
On Tuesday, Universities UK (UUK), which represents university employers, said a Joint Negotiating Committee, made up of an equal number of UUK and UCU members with an independent chairman, had voted in favour of the proposed reform.
UCU said in a statement that “the chair sided with the employers’ representatives”, adding that strikes “have become much more likely”.
UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said: “Staff will feel utterly betrayed by their leaders. We are disappointed at how talks ended today, particularly after UUK suggested yesterday that it wanted more talks to avoid strikes.
“Universities must be on notice that unless there are dramatic changes in their negotiators’ position then strike action will be arriving on campus next month.
“There is much talk of a crisis of leadership in higher education at the moment, especially after the recent vice-chancellor pay and perks scandals.
“Now is the time for university leaders to recognise the scale of this problem, how angry their staff are and to work with us to avoid widespread disruption in universities.”
UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said: 'Staff will feel utterly betrayed by their leaders….Universities must be on notice that unless there are dramatic changes in their negotiators' position then strike action will be arriving on campus next month.'https://t.co/m6ciTYWcR8
— UCU (@ucu) January 23, 2018
The union said it would now firm up start dates for strikes, with action likely to begin with a two-day walkout on February 22 and 23, followed by three-day, four-day and five-day strikes in future weeks.
Other action could include members working to their contracts, meaning they could refuse to cover classes, reschedule classes lost on strike days or undertake voluntary duties.
UUK said a “negotiated settlement” could not be reached following more than 30 meetings with UCU, adding that the pension changes would “offer members greater flexibility and choice”.
A spokesman said: “The reform proposal will tackle the scheme’s deficit and the significant rise in the cost of future pensions so that universities can continue to offer attractive pensions to staff, now and in the future.
“It will also ensure that contributions remain affordable to both staff members and employers.
“Today’s decision is a necessary step to put the scheme on a sustainable footing for the long term.
“Our focus now is to work with USS and UCU to shape the details of the new benefit structure so that it offers flexibility, choice and market-leading defined contributions pensions.”
Proposal agreed to reform USS pensions. UUK's statement is on our website https://t.co/XZiZPRoRUy
— Universities UK (@UniversitiesUK) January 23, 2018
Hundreds of thousands of university workers are understood to be enrolled in the USS pensions scheme, mainly those working at older institutions established before 1992.
UCU has been balloting members enrolled in the scheme since November.
It previously announced that 88% of members who voted backed strike action, while 93% backed action short of walkouts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here