THE work that universities across Scotland are doing to help schools deliver Advanced Highers started almost as an afterthought.
Through the drive to widen access to students from poorer backgrounds university staff noticed the lack of opportunities to study Advanced Highers in some schools.
Similarly, university staff also became aware that for some areas of study, such as the sciences, school facilities could not compete with their own laboratory space and equipment.
As a result universities increasingly began opening their doors to school pupils to study Advanced Highers.
The initiatives are important because Advanced Highers are increasingly seen as the best preparation for university.
However, because access to subjects can be limited in schools where few pupils want to take them there is a considerable advantage to those in middle class areas or private schools who have a full range to choose from.
A rising number of children are staying on to S6, but only around one in 10 will go on to study an Advanced Higher – in some cases due to a lack of choice.
Current difficulties recruiting teachers in key subjects such as maths and science has exacerbated the issue and budget cuts are already forcing some councils to consider reducing qualification choices even further.
The answer may lie in the currently collaborations between councils and universities.
Over time ad hoc arrangements have grown into something much more substantial with hundreds of pupils across the country now routinely travelling to universities to study Advanced Highers.
The success of these initiatives, with pass rates well above the national average, is also a compelling factor, but difficult questions persist.
Are such schemes taking away a crucial element of what schools should be offering with cuts to budgets likely to further erode subject choice to sixth year pupils?
In addition, if the model is seen as something worth expanding within a more formal structure, then who will fund it?
The Glasgow Caledonian hub is jointly funded by the Scottish Funding Council and Glasgow City Council, but budget pressures make its long-term future difficult to predict.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here