The Scottish Government classes school leavers working on zero hours contracts as a success – despite Nicola Sturgeon criticising such jobs as exploitative and demeaning, it has emerged.
Figures on the number of school leavers achieving "positive destinations" are used to gauge the success of the education system.
But while the first minister recently said zero hours contracts "demean and exploit" workers, and the SNP's website states: "The SNP will support tough action to end exploitative zero hours contracts," ministers continue to count them when defending the performance of schools and colleges.
In March Education Secretary John Swinney said while 87 per cent of school leavers had gone to positive destinations in 2007, the figure was 93.3 per cent in 2015-6.
Jim Thewliss, general secretary of headteachers' body School Leaders Scotland said the definition of a positive destination used by the government was "woolly", adding: "The parameters of what counts as a positive destination at the moment are so wide and open, you can interpret it in more or less any way you want".
Professor John McKendrick, a child poverty expert at Glasgow Caledonian University, said the Government could not argue that zero hours contracts were bad and then count them as a positive destination: "It says something about ho w this government regards young people - they are paying lip service to young people," he said.
Labour leader Kezia Dugdale has accused Nicola Sturgeon of using zero hours contracts to "hide her failings" in education and skills.
A Government spokeswoman told the Times Educational Supplement (TES) that positive destinations include anyone receiving payment from an employer, or undertaking training in employment. She said it included "all types of employment" but said the government was committed to discouraging the use of "exploitative" zero hours contracts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel