John Swinney has defended budget cuts for implementing education reforms despite concerns raised by MSPs.
The Education Secretary insisted the flagship Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) is at a stage that justifies a reduction in the development budget, when he appeared before Holyrood's Education Committee.
Analysis by the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Spice) for the committee shows money for CfE has been reduced across the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), Education Scotland and central government budgets.
Read more: SNP accused of education pledge 'con' as figures show fall in student support
Funding to support implementation of the reforms and the new national qualifications has reduced by 49.2% between the draft budgets of 2016-17 and 2017-18 on the grounds that "budget decrease stems from a maturity of the CfE and completed implementation of the new national qualifications".
Conservative MSP Ross Thomson said: "This comes at a time when the SQA have told this committee that they are going through an intense period of assessment redesign, which is on top of business as usual, on top of their transformation programme, the very tight timeline to meet, and they were very clear... that this requires additional resource.
"It's also at a time when Education Scotland have been charged with burning a barrage of bureaucracy and we've received some pretty poor Pisa (Programme for International Student Assessment) results.
Read more: SNP accused of education pledge 'con' as figures show fall in student support
"So the response from the Scottish Government is to cut cash from the general curriculum by £4 million, money for qualifications assessment has been reduced by 50% and non-staffing budgets for Education Scotland by 16%."
He asked Mr Swinney whether he agrees with comments from Lindsay Paterson, professor of education policy at the University of Edinburgh, that the move is "a big risk" and "unwise".
The Education Secretary responded: "No, I don't. I think we have developed the curriculum to a very advanced stage, the qualifications framework is developed equally to a very advanced stage."
He said that while changes are being made to re-balance the assessment of the qualifications, that is a "minor change".
Mr Swinney continued: "I hear loud and clear the necessity for Education Scotland to be more focused to reduce the volume of guidance that it generates and that's exactly what I'm doing, and we don't need more money to reduce the amount of guidance we produce. We need to make sure that is sharper and clearer and has more impact within the system.
Read more: SNP accused of education pledge 'con' as figures show fall in student support
"So I think the decisions that we've taken have been robust and clear decisions. I obviously will continue to monitor all of these decisions as we go through the financial year but I'm confident that we've taken a set of decisions that are appropriate for the stage of development of Scottish education."
Labour MSP Johann Lamont pressed Mr Swinney on the "huge uncertainty" she said exists in the sector and among parents about the reforms.
In response, he said definitive guidance on the delivery of CfE had been issued earlier this year, adding: "The feedback I've had from teachers about that guidance in August was that it was enormously helpful in simplifying the guidance and the approach that the teaching professions were operating within."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here