“MOUNTAINS” of curriculum guidance issued to Scottish teachers over the past 12 years has been described as “self-evident lunacy” by an education expert.
Keir Bloomer, convener of the Royal Society of Edinburgh’s education committee, said the overload of “nearly incomprehensible” information was hampering work to free up teachers to spend more time in the classroom.
The comments, during an evidence session at the Scottish Parliament’s education committee, came after John Swinney, the Education Secretary, pledged to cut workload.
He stepped in following complaints teachers had been swamped by bureaucracy throughout the roll-out of the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) reforms which were designed to empower schools.
Mr Swinney has already ordered schools quango and inspectorate body Education Scotland to produce slimmed down guidance and the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) has been asked to scrap internal assessments for key school qualifications.
Mr Bloomer said he was pleased Mr Swinney “seemed determined” to do something, but went on to question the logic of producing even more guidance and of involving Education Scotland - which has been responsible for producing much of the guidance.
He said: “We have allowed mountains of guidance, much of it very badly written, nearly incomprehensible, to accumulate over the years, and that now stands in the way of the de-cluttering of the curriculum.
“One of the things that has concerned me in the last few weeks has been the choice of Education Scotland... to look at bureaucracy and unnecessary workload.
“If they are to be involved in slimming this down then there are serious capacity issues and also something of a re-programming exercise will have to be undertaken.”
While some political mistakes had been made, Mr Bloomer said most had come from bodies such as Education Scotland, which was supposed to support the roll-out of CfE.
He said: “The quality of advice that governments have received has not been strong and there has been a lack of strategic overview as a whole with the result that what has taken place is that guidance has been added to and multiplied and the overall consequence of that has been to obscure rather than to illuminate.”
Mr Bloomer, one of the original architects of CfE, also highlighted a lack of proper scrutiny of the reforms.
He said: “This is the most significant development that has taken place in Scottish education since the war and no evaluation system was set up at the outset.
“Successive governments have made claims of success in relation to CfE and to be honest with you, they are based on no evidence whatsoever.”
An Education Scotland spokeswoman said: “The review was very clear that action needs to be taken by all parties including schools themselves and national bodies, including Education Scotland itself.”
Meanwhile, Liz Smith, education spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, called for a proper reason why internal assessments had been scrapped.
She said: “Parents, pupils and teachers have a right to know exactly why unit assessments have been abolished when it was previously intimated that significant changes could not be made without compromising the exam system.”
“It seems a very welcome development that unit assessments will disappear, but parents and pupils want to know the real reason for the change.”
She added: “It is not good enough that there is a lack of clarity over this and that is something that must be addressed by the SNP and its government education agencies.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel