The man accused of murdering schoolgirl April Jones was a "fantasist" who had "a clear interest in child pornography and in child murder cases", a court has heard.
Mark Bridger, 47, who claimed to have served in the SAS but was in fact an abattoir worker, murdered the five-year-old and played a "cruel game" in an attempt to cover his tracks, Mold Crown Court heard.
April vanished while playing on her bike near her home in Machynlleth, mid-Wales, on October 1 last year and her body has never been found.
The court yesterday heard investigators found numerous indecent images on the defendant's laptop, as well as pictures of young girls who had been murdered, including Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman from the Soham murder case. Bridger also had images of April and her half-sisters, aged 13 and 16, the jury heard.
On the first day of his trial, the court heard Bridger accepts he "probably killed" April in a car accident, but that he "blanked out" afterwards and cannot remember what he did with her body.
The jury was shown a photo of the cottage where Bridger lived – and where April's blood and DNA were found.
Elwen Evans ,QC, prosecuting, told the jury: "This is the house where the blood, the bone fragments were found."
Speaking of Bridger's claims he was in the Army, Miss Evans said: "Military records have of course been checked. His account of any career in the Army, in the forces, was a lie and a fantasy."
Miss Evans also told the jury about the kind of obscene material which had been found on Bridger's laptop. She said: "In addition to child pornography and photos of young girls, the defendant also had an interest in child murder and rape cases."
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article