FARMING is never easy and rarely profitable. Modern family farms are a full-time, 24/7 job. The self-isolation which we have all endured during the coronavirus pandemic, is an everyday occurrence for farmers, in what can be a lonely and challenging profession. In a bid to make ends meet, many farms diversified into agri-tourism, letting self-catering holiday cottages or providing B&B, or running farm shops. But the coronavirus has devastated this sector, hitting farm finances for six. The closure of the entire hotel, pub, restaurant and café sector led to many dairy farmers losing their market and having to pour milk down the drain. Now, the lethal combination of the pandemic and a potential cliff-edge Brexit could cause a meltdown in rural Scotland.
Farmers were amongst the most important key workers during the lockdown, but many felt that they had been forgotten. Their reward for ensuring a constant supply of healthy, nutritious food, produced to the highest animal welfare and environmental standards, could be betrayal, as Britain’s floodgates are thrown open to cheap imports. Farmers and landowners, far from benefitting from new worldwide trade deals promised by the arch-Brexiteers, could see their markets decline sharply as competition from sub-standard produce expands and subsidies disappear. Land values will plummet.
Under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) many farmers received 60% of their income from EU subsidies via the single farm payment. For most businesses it was the difference between survival and collapse. Direct CAP payments to Britain averaged £2.88 billion a year. Last year these subsidies were worth around €200 a hectare (£58 an acre), an average of £22,700 per UK farm. Only the super-efficient, top 10% of farm businesses could survive without them. Most farmers have thin margins, if they have any margins at all. But in England, direct financial support for food production is to be phased out from next year and replaced over a seven-year transition period by an Environmental Land Management Scheme. In Scotland, the SNP Government intends to continue existing CAP schemes until 2024, during which time it will implement what it calls a "stability and simplicity" approach. Of course, all of these schemes depend on the post Covid-19 availability of funding. With the country facing a recession to end all recessions, according to Chancellor Rishi Sunak, there is no way that current subsidy levels will be maintained by either Westminster or Holyrood.
The European Commission estimates that UK land prices will fall sharply if subsidies are reduced and will fall by 30% if they are abolished. For farmers who have taken out loans against the value of their land, a loss of value could be fatal. New subsidy schemes have been designed to put greater emphasis on the environment, removing support from food production. This is a grave mistake. The one clear message that we should have learned during the pandemic was the need to have a guaranteed security of food supply during a time of crisis.
During the protracted Brexit campaign, we were told that the EU’s protectionist policies discriminated against cheap food imports and forced up food prices. In other words, those who supported Brexit wanted cheaper food. That means throwing open UK markets to cheap food from Africa, Australia, North America, Brazil, and Argentina, causing chaos for UK farm gate prices, a further fall in land values and widespread bankruptcies. It also means importing food produced to hygiene and animal welfare standards that would be illegal right now in Britain. The UK is currently 60% self-sufficient in food supplies, a vitally important factor during a time of crisis. A tsunami of cheap food imports would see food self-sufficiency plummet.
Donald Trump has assured Boris Johnson that America will sign a trade deal with the UK very quickly following Brexit. Trump typically stated that the deal would be great for both Britain and America. What he means is that Britain will have to open our doors to vast imports of American hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken, loaded with antibiotics, all currently banned under strict EU regulations. Not only will such imports destroy our own markets for high quality farm produce, it will also sit uneasily with British consumers.
Although agriculture is devolved to the Scottish Government, trade relations are reserved to Westminster, where the International Trade Secretary Liz Truss is in charge of negotiations with the Americans. She said in May, “We will never undermine our high domestic environmental protection, animal welfare and food safety standards, ensuring that in any agreement British farmers are always able to compete.” But when Conservative MP Neil Parish tabled an amendment to the UK Government’s landmark Agriculture Bill, calling for future trade deals to prohibit imports of food not produced to the equivalent standards of farmers and producers here, it was defeated by 328 to 277 votes. Now Woody Johnson, the US Ambassador to the UK has stated, “American agricultural products are safe, nutritious and delicious. These products should absolutely be included in a US-UK free trade agreement.” With the Trump administration pumping billions of dollars into US farm subsidies, they are desperate to open new markets.
If no extension to the current transition period is agreed with the EU before the end of June deadline, a hard cliff-edge Brexit moves closer to becoming a reality. That will mean we will have to apply World Trade Organisation (WTO) tariffs on exported produce going out of the UK and we will need to set our own tariffs on imports coming in. Import tariffs would be hugely damaging to British agriculture by setting a low or zero tariff rate on cereals, eggs, pork, fruit and veg and some dairy produce, placing producers at a major disadvantage and undermining efforts to negotiate new trade arrangements. It would also expose those sectors which have some level of tariff protection, such as beef and lamb, by uneven application of import and export tariffs as well as exposure to unfair competition. Let’s avoid a cliff-edge Brexit at all costs and protect our farmers and consumers from second rate imports. They deserve our support.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel