The Bank of England has referred an “unacceptable” use of its audio feed of press conferences to the City watchdog after it emerged that hedge funds could have profited by listening in seconds ahead of rivals.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was drafted in after the Bank discovered a back-up communications system it installed a few years ago had been tapped and shared with a market news service.
The Bank yesterday declined to comment on whether the police are also involved.
READ MORE: Fungal infection ruled out as factor in death of woman at Glasgow superhospital
The market news service has not been publicly identified. However, the Bank said that it had revoked the service’s access to its audio feed.
Statisma News, a service which offers live streaming of Parliament and Bank of England press conferences, released a statement on its website, reportedly after inquiries from the Financial Times.
It said: “Statisma is a technology company specialising in the delivery of publicly available audio content.
“We DO NOT carry embargoed information and we DO NOT release information without it first being made available to the public.
“It is impossible to ‘hack’ or ‘eavesdrop’ any live public event or press conference. Any such suggestion is dismissed out of hand.”
Hedge funds could have gained a crucial advantage over competitors by accessing comments ahead of the broadcast feed, an investigation by The Times revealed.
Having access to Bank of England Governor Mark Carney’s comments even seconds ahead of a rival would give traders a vital competitive advantage in the high-speed world of finance.
High-frequency trading sees huge numbers of transactions executed in a fraction of a second via powerful computer programmes monitoring multiple markets simultaneously.
READ MORE: Labour MSP warns party of 'oblivion' if it sticks by hard Unionism
The strategy is so lucrative that some companies have invested heavily in equipment such as microwave transmitters to get information a split second before prices change.
The illegitimate use of the audio can be compared to insider trading because it gave traders a boost based on information their rivals did not have.
The Bank said the audio feed had been installed in the event of a failure of the video broadcast, and had been misused by the supplier since earlier this year.
“This wholly unacceptable use of the audio feed was without the Bank’s knowledge or consent, and is being investigated further,” it said.
“On identifying this, the Bank immediately disabled the third party supplier’s access.
“As a result, the third party supplier did not have any access to the most recent press conference and will no longer play any part in any of the Bank’s future press conferences.
“The Bank operates the highest standards of information security around the release of the market sensitive decisions of its policy committees.
“The issue identified related only to the broadcast of press conferences that follow such statements.”
According to the Times, those who subscribed to the market news service offering the Bank’s audio had a five to eight-second head start over competitors.
Sue Noffke, UK equities fund manager at Schroders, told BBC Radio Four: “What Mark Carney is talking about is the outlook for interest rates, the outlook for inflation.
“Those outlook comments can be determining interest rates, the value of the pound, and determine a lot of financial instruments.”
Traders with access to this information could, for example, buy significant amounts of a currency which they know is likely to increase in value once a policy announcement or comment is made public. They could then sell this after currency markets move higher to make a profit.
Ms Nofke added that funds who “could be making money on that” are likely to be using artificial intelligence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel