CONTROVERSIAL primary school tests are not compulsory, but should be seen as an ‘integral part of everyday learning’, according to new guidance.
The clarification on the literacy and numeracy assessments - in a joint letter from the Scottish Government and council officials - is the latest attempt to clear up confusion over whether parents have a right to opt out.
The assessments were introduced as a response to concerns over falling standards and a lack of consistent data.
However, critics claim they are too stressful for young pupils and a national campaign was launched to encourage parents to opt out.
The issue is confusing because, while councils have a wider legal duty to provide education, the curriculum is not backed up in legislation - meaning parents don’t have a specific legal right to opt out.
The new letter from the Government and Ades, which represents education directors, said the assessments should be seen as a key tool to inform teachers of the needs of pupils.
It adds: “The ... assessments, in common with virtually all aspects of the Scottish curriculum and its delivery, are not provided for in legislation.
“This means that they cannot be seen as compulsory, but also that there cannot be a legal right for parents to withdraw their children from the assessments, or indeed any other part of the school curriculum with the exception of some parts of religious observance and instruction.
“In practice, however, should any parents or carers have any particular concerns about their child’s participation ... they should discuss this with their school with a view to reaching agreement on whether the child will undertake the assessments.”
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union, which has opposed testing in P1, questioned whether delivery of the assessments fell under the terms of a wider legal duty on councils to provide education.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary, said: “This letter incorrectly suggests there is a legal duty on local authorities to deliver the Scottish assessments.
“It also overstates the educational value of assessments, contrary to the weight of evidence supplied by our members.”
Mr Flanagan said the EIS supported the “absolute right” of parents to opt children out through a request to their school or local authority.
Sue Palmer, chair of education charity Upstart Scotland, which is leading the opt out campaign, said the guidance clarified the right of parents to withdraw.
She said: “If the assessments aren’t compulsory, parents are obviously entitled to withdraw their children. This is especially the case in P1 where they are unlikely to be of any use and have proved distressing for some children.
“The most sensible course of action would be to drop the P1 tests immediately and consult with teaching unions and others on the best way forward for the P4 and P7 tests.”
Eileen Prior, executive director of parent body Connect, which has backed the opt-out campaign, said: “This letter confirms that these tests are not compulsory. That is all we need to know.
“If they are not compulsory, then parents can discuss their concerns with their schools and can withdraw their child from the P1 test. I am sure no school would want to force a child or a parent into a situation which might cause distress.”
Last week, the Scottish Government was accused of ‘misleading’ parents in a letter from a top civil servant over the right to opt out.
Graeme Logan, a deputy director in the Scottish Government’s learning directorate, sent a letter to councils stating parents did not have the right to opt out apart from “exceptional circumstances” quoting advice from the Society of Local Authority Lawyers in Scotland (Solar). A spokesman for Solar later told The Herald the body had not provided advice to the Scottish Government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel