CLAIMS that the BBC lacks impartiality are nothing new.
Allegations of biased journalism within the publicly funded broadcaster have been historically made on both the left and right of the political spectrum.
But on Thursday a new social media campaign fuelled by a body of Scottish nationalists to boycott the BBC went viral, prompting a fresh discussion over whether the state broadcaster is biased.
The #BBCSwitchOff campaign is being supported by those who believe that the broadcaster is biased.
A fresh wave of protests began at 6pm on Thursday when it was suggested people switch off the BBC.
It was the number one trended hashtag on Twitter on Thursday across the UK with BBCBias also in the top ten. It was a similar story in Glasgow and Edinburgh.
One of the reasons for the campaign was the belief in some quarters that Jeremy Corbyn and left-of-centre politics is not getting a fair hearing on the Beeb.
Many Corbyn supporters were up in arms over an image of the Labour leader on Newsnight in March which they felt had been altered to look ‘more Russian’.
It came hot on the heels of Labour moving to defend Jeremy Corbyn's comments claiming the BBC is biased towards 'Israel's right to exist'.
The Labour leader made the comments to Iranian state TV channel Press TV in 2011, when he was a backbencher.
On Thursday it appeared the BBC changed a headline on its story about Wednesday night’s attacks on Israel after the Board of Deputies angrily complained about its “appalling” stance on the issue.
The BBC’s original headline was “Israeli air strikes ‘kill woman and toddler’”, with no mention of the rocket attacks which came before the strikes.
On Thursday morning, the Board of Deputies tweeted: “Appalling @BBCNews headline after Israel responded to *150* rockets fired at its towns by terrorists while families were asleep. We have complained and you should too”, including a link to the BBC complaints page.
I truly thought the #BBCswitchoff was a Scottish thing....nice to see the rest of the UK has awoken to what we've put up with for years....and nobody believed us back then.....
— Oor Blaze fae Skye (@Blazespage) August 9, 2018
Will BBC report that #BBCswitchoff is trending at number one? We'll never know. #BBCswitchoff
— Mr Ethical (@nw_nicholas) August 9, 2018
The BBC subsequently changed its headline to “Gaza airstrikes ‘kill woman and child’ after rockets hit Israel”.
The Board subsequently said this headline was "better... but it’s still an inversion".
"Israel’s cities were struck by 150 rockets, sending tens of thousands in to shelters. Surely the headline should reflect this,” it said.
A BBC spokesperson said: "“Although the original headline was not factually incorrect, we updated it to add more context to the story.”
The Twitter campaign has been adopted by people outwith Labour activists, including a body of Scottish independence supporters.
Famously hundreds of Yes supporters held a demonstration outside BBC Scotland's headquarters over alleged bias in the network's coverage of the independence referendum in September, 2014.
And last week, the BBC moved to deny political bias after a pro-independence blogger criticised the public broadcaster after his YouTube channel was shut down in a copyright row.
wow not only is #BBCswitchoff number 1` now . its also the most tweeted in the last 4 hours and the 13th in the psast 24 hours . Well done guys keep it up.
— Hands Off Our Parliament #ScotlandCalling (@HOOP_hands_off) August 9, 2018
Amused by #BBCswitchoff hashtag. We in Scotland have been mocked for complaining about warped @BBC reporting for years. #misreportingScotland @BBCScotlandNews
— Sharon Gathercole (@Sharonwifey) August 9, 2018
Stuart Campbell, who runs the Wings Over Scotland channel, claimed his channel was closed without warning after the publicly funded BBC complained about 13 videos that had been uploaded to it.
The channel of another prominent independence campaigner, Peter Curran, was also shut down after BBC copyright complaints.
Meanwhile it was demonstrated that the BBC had not taken similar action with other political sites that used its material.
The BBC halted its action while it reviewed its copyright enforcement responses and the channel was reinstated.
It was reinstated by YouTube while the BBC said it will review its actions.
While the organisation is required to provide impartial coverage, 40 per cent of people feel this isn’t the case – according to a poll in May by BMG Research.
BMG asked 1,005 British adults if they consider the BBC to be politically neutral, and just 37 per cent of them said they did.
But nobody can quite make up their mind why.
So here we go....people who are tired of #bbcbias get a chance to join the #BBCswitchoff tonight at 6pm starting with the @bbcnews. Judging by listening figures people have already turned off Humphrys @sarahsands100 & @BBCr4today. We need a fair & neutral national broadcaster. https://t.co/4L2g9hROOW
— STEVE MOSS Ⓥ (@mr_stephen_moss) August 9, 2018
#BBCSwitchOff
— Paul O'Neill (@krelbourne35) August 9, 2018
Fed up with the way they normalise the racist and intolerant attitudes of those on the right and victimise and smear those on the left.
Always giving Tories the top jobs. No balance at all. They dont even try to hide it anymore.#BBCBias pic.twitter.com/qYzJYtVSNA
A combined 22 per cent of respondents felt it was either somewhat or strongly biased towards left-wing views, while 18 per cent felt it was somewhat or strongly biased towards the right. Nearly a quarter of people said they just didn’t know.
Last week the BBC withdrew an educational film about immigration following complaints that it was biased.
The film, aimed at GCSE pupils, contained claims that Britain was 'multicultural long before curry and carnival' and that debate over immigration had fuelled a 'huge rise' in support for far-Right politics.
It was pulled from circulation and removed from YouTube after complaints that it broke impartiality rules.
Last week it emerged BBC Radio 4’s flagship news and current affairs programme, Today, which for decades has set the agenda for the media-political elite, has been haemorrhaging listeners.
According to figures released by RAJAR, the official body for the monitoring of radio audiences, the programme has lost more than 800,000 listeners over the past year.
#BBCswitchoff The difference between the Boris coverage and the Corbyn coverage is a classic illustration of #bbcbias
— Warren Lee Clarke (@WarrenLClarke) August 9, 2018
Fight back against #BBCBias from 6 pm this evening :
— Jerry Hicks (@JerryHicksUnite) August 9, 2018
1 Switch off the BBC at 6.
2.Join the Twitter storm about BBC Tory Propoganda bias
3.Always use the hashtag #BBCSwitchOff it's case sensitive. little people can change things too it's#BBCSwitchOff pic.twitter.com/aDz0ZZscgr
The BBC noted that audiences for news and current affairs programmes fluctuate over time, and suggested a “quieter news agenda” partly explained the drop-off.
But Tom Mills, a lecturer in sociology at Aston University and the author of The BBC: Myth of a Public Service says it may be because "liberals and leftists have finally given up on the programme".
Accusations of a left-wing bias were often made against the BBC by members of Margaret Thatcher's 1980s Conservative government.
Norman Tebbit called the BBC the Stateless Person's Broadcasting Corporation because of what he regarded as its unpatriotic and neutral coverage of the Falklands War, and Conservative MP Peter Bruinvels called it the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation.
Nine years ago, BBC director general, Greg Dyke, criticised the BBC as part of a "Westminster conspiracy" to maintain the British political system.
Nigel Farage has previously attacked the organisation for being too left-wing, and Leave voters accused Question Time of deliberately picking ‘less intelligent Leavers’ for a TV audience last year.
Dear @BBCNews please explain to me how Boris Johnson’s outrageous and racist rhetoric is just “silly language” but despite Corbyn’s lifelong fight against racism, you are happy to basically compare him to Hitler? #BBCBias #boycott https://t.co/4pxY6Opexe
— a kayla (@ReHaNaBaNaNa007) August 8, 2018
The BBC last month defended its Brexit coverage after being accused the corporation of "journalistic cowardice" in its reporting of the EU Referendum and its aftermath.
In response, James Stephenson, news editor at BBC News, said it had “reported on every aspect of the [Brexit] story over the past two years.”
He added: “There can be few times in the BBC’s history when its journalism has mattered more. This is not an organisation frightened of journalism, but committed to it.”
BBC's Europe editor last year hit out at claims the broadcaster is biased against Brexit - claiming they have been blocked from holding European officials to the same standard they hold British officials to.
Speaking to BBC's News Watch programme, which monitors complaints about the broadcaster, Katja Adler, the BBC's Europe editor, addressed claims of spreading "doom and gloom".
Ms Adler, who is based in Brussels, said she understands viewers who see this perceived bias and complain the BBC unfairly portrays the British side of the talks.
She explained: "It is a fair comment to make.
"It is my job to put across the European perspective, which may come across anti-Brexit.
"But this is all because, since the Brexit talks started, there has been silence enforced inside the EU Commission and among EU leaders, in order to only let Michel Barnier speak about Brexit.
"We do not have the same access to talk to the same players as we do on the British side to put the difficult questions to them.
"That can be very frustrating for our viewers, and it can seem like we are not doing our job, but the players just do not let us interview them on the record, so they end up being sources or insiders."
She said this led to the EU officials not being held to the same level of scrutiny as those in Britain, but insisted reporters in Brussels were trying their best to hold them to account.
The BBC were approached for comment on the Twitter campaign.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel