Labour’s difficulties over anti-Semitism deepened as deputy leader Tom Watson faced a campaign to oust him for speaking out over the party’s handling of the row.
Thousands of Twitter users mounted a #ResignWatson campaign aimed at Mr Watson following his warning that Labour faced a “vortex of eternal shame” unless it got to grips with the issue.
Meanwhile, Jewish groups rebuffed Jeremy Corbyn’s latest attempt to draw a line under the row despite the Labour leader apologising for the hurt caused by the situation.
Mr Watson broke ranks with his leader by calling for an end to disciplinary action against Ian Austin and Dame Margaret Hodge – MPs who have criticised Mr Corbyn – and the adoption in full of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition and examples of anti-Semitism.
That provoked a furious and occasionally abusive online campaign aimed at Mr Watson but the senior MP received support from a number of parliamentary colleagues.
Mr Watson said: “It sometimes feels like people have been calling for me to stand down from day one but I never, ever thought I’d be facing demands to #resignwatson for standing up for people who are facing prejudice and hate.”
Former foreign secretary David Miliband was among those backing Mr Watson, saying he had recognised “the gravity of Labour’s situation”.
In a sideswipe at Mr Corbyn, the former MP said: “Power reveals. In this case it has revealed myopia and sectarianism at the top, betraying Labour’s history and failing the needs of the country.”
Wes Streeting, a prominent critic of Mr Corbyn, said the situation was a “cesspit”, writing: “Imagine demanding the resignation of our deputy leader because he’s called for meaningful action against racism.”
Mr Corbyn had sought to defuse the row with a video message insisting he was working to drive anti-Semitism out of the party.
He said: “I am sorry for the hurt that has been caused to many Jewish people. We have been too slow in processing disciplinary cases of, mostly, online anti-Semitic abuse by party members.
“We are acting to speed this process up.
“People who hold anti-Semitic views have no place in the Labour Party. They may be few – the number of cases over the past three years represents less than 0.1% of Labour’s membership of more than half-a-million – but one is too many.
“Our party must never be a home for such people and never will be. People who use anti-Semitic poison need to understand: you do not do it in my name or the name of my party. You are not our supporters.
“And anyone who denies that this has surfaced within our party is clearly actually wrong and contributing to the problem.”
But his message failed to win over Jewish groups.
In a joint message, Marie van der Zyl, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Jonathan Goldstein, the chair of the Jewish Leadership Council, accused Mr Corbyn of failing to acknowledge his own “problematic” history.
“Until Corbyn can honestly and fully own up to the problematic nature of some of his own past actions, he will struggle to lead the cultural change that is needed to clear the decks of a loud minority within Labour who behave in this way,” they said.
In a New Statesman article they said the leader’s office had asked whether it would be insensitive to release a statement on Friday afternoon, when Jews would be preparing to observe the Sabbath.
“We said it would be an act of tremendous bad faith. He clearly ignored us.”
The Holocaust Educational Trust’s chief executive, Karen Pollock, also highlighted Mr Corbyn’s past actions, including in 2010 presiding over an event “comparing Israel to the Nazis”, in 2011 supporting a change from Holocaust Memorial Day to “genocide awareness day”, and in 2012 chairing an event “where a speaker referred to victims of the Holocaust as now being the ‘torturers'”.
She said: “To do it once is a mistake, twice perhaps careless, but multiple times? Deliberate. It seems to me that Jeremy Corbyn is a serial offender.”
Prominent Jewish Labour MP Luciana Berger told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour: “We are looking for action – what is the leadership of the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn actually going to do?
“If you listen very closely to the words in the video and read the piece that was released on Friday evening there isn’t anything different that the Labour Party, at the moment, is going to do to ameliorate what is a very, very, very serious situation.”
She added: “You only have to look online today to see the bile and the filth that is being said still in the Labour Party’s and in Jeremy Corbyn’s name.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel