MPS have given the green light to plans that could see nuclear waste buried deep in vaults beneath national parks.
The Government has launched a search for an area to site an underground radioactive waste store and set out the framework for making planning decisions on the proposal in England.
The Commons business, energy and industrial strategy committee backed the Government’s approach and decided against calling for national parks and areas of outstanding natural beauty to be excluded.
The cross-party group said “in our view it is right for safety matters to prevail over environmental concerns in this case”.
It added that existing planning safeguards would prevent “intrusive developments and environmental damage”.
Giving evidence to the committee, energy minister Richard Harrington said: “I am not saying we should have them on national parks, but it would be very wrong to exclude them at the moment in this big policy statement.”
The Government’s approach to “geological disposal infrastructure (GDI)” was set out in a draft national policy statement (NPS) in January.
A GDI would involve specially engineered vaults and tunnels located deep underground that would be able to contain waste which is more radioactive than surface sites could store.
In its assessment of the NPS, the committee said it was “fit for purpose”.
But it said ministers should clarify the “level of uncertainty” about the waste that would be stored in a GDI and make information about proposals accessible to members of the public to “promote engagement by prospective communities”.
It also recommended that any developer should rely on local employment and sourcing opportunities in areas where a GDI would be located.
Kate Blagojevic, head of energy at Greenpeace UK, said: “As we have cleaner, safer and cheaper alternatives available, it’s mystifying why the UK, alone among major western nations, insists on propping up this obsolete 20th-century technology."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel