The efforts of John Major's government to disguise the vast scale of the operation to prop up the pound in the Black Wednesday financial fiasco are laid bare in newly released official papers.
Following the dramatic events of September 16 1992, Chancellor Norman Lamont was under pressure to spell out how much of Britain's foreign currency reserves had been used in the failed bid to prevent sterling crashing out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).
Publicly, Mr (now Lord) Lamont insisted no government would reveal such information, but papers released by the National Archives show that behind the scenes, he was "increasingly anxious" about the way the true state of the reserves was being concealed.
The failure to prevent the pound falling out of the ERM - which pegged its value to the deutschmark - was a personal humiliation for Mr Major, who, as chancellor, had taken Britain into the ERM just two years earlier.
As interest rates rose from 10% to 12% and then 15% on a single day, it dealt a devastating blow to the Conservatives' reputation for economic competence.
Figures finally released by the Treasury in 2005 under the Freedom of Information Act showed that in the course of August and September 1992, the Bank of England sold almost 40 billion dollars in foreign currency as the pound came under sustained attack from foreign speculators.
The final cost of the operation was estimated at £3.3 billion.
But while it instantly transformed the position of the reserves - from a positive balance of 18 billion dollars to a negative balance of 16 billion dollars - the official figures at the time showed only a "minimal" loss of 2 billion dollars.
The details of what exactly happened are spelled out in a letter to No 10 from Mr Lamont's private secretary Jeremy Heywood (now the Cabinet Secretary), dated November 26 1992 setting out the chancellor's strategy for rebuilding the reserves.
He explained the government had been able to disguise the amount of additional borrowing required, in part through the creation of what was described as a "secret negative forward book", to re-acquire foreign exchange through "forward swaps" worth around 12.5 billion dollars.
However, once the crisis was over, the opaque manner in which the operation was conducted meant the only way of running down the forward book was through a "non-publicised" programme of using sterling to buy back foreign currency - known as "creaming off".
"In principle the forward book could be run down either by public borrowing or lower gross reserves; but having consciously disguised this part of the September's operations it would now be very difficult to explain the real reason why we were now undertaking further borrowing or revealing lower gross reserves," the letter states.
"That points to non-publicised 'creaming off' as the only acceptable approach - it is also the only way the net reserve position can be improved."
The letter notes that the Bank was "very cautious" about the tactic fearing it could lead to further falls in the pound, fuelling inflation.
In an accompanying memo, Mary Francis in the No 10 private office notes: "He (Mr Lamont) is increasingly anxious about the way it is being used to conceal the actual state of the reserves."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here