BRUSSELS will have to accept Theresa May’s Chequers Plan on Brexit as Britain’s “final offer” or see the UK crash out of the European Union without a deal, Andrea Leadsom has insisted.
The warning from the Commons Leader came as her Cabinet colleague Dominic Raab, the new Brexit Secretary, held his first meeting in the Belgian capital with Michel Barnier, making clear he was “looking forward to intensifying, heating up the negotiations and making sure we are in the best position to get the best deal".
The EU’s chief negotiator, who was due to have dinner with his new counterpart, noted: “On the withdrawal agreement, it is a matter of urgency to agree a legally operative backstop for Ireland and Northern Ireland. We need an all-weather insurance policy."
- READ MORE: Euro Commission accepts petition that could help the British retain EU citizenship after Brexit
In an interview with The House magazine, Mrs Leadsom claimed the EU had not taken the UK seriously in terms of the future agreement.
“What this[Chequers] deal does is it says to them: 'Right, now we can have a free trading area where there won't be the need for border checks and controls.'”
She went on: “It needs to take this seriously or we are heading for no deal. The message to the EU has to be: ‘This is the final offer.’”
The Commons Leader made clear the UK was “ramping up” its no-deal preparations and a failure to accept the Chequers Plan would mean “that's where we will be heading and they will have forced us to do that”.
- Theresa May: EU must change ‘unworkable’ Brexit position
Asked if no deal would be a disaster for Britain, Ms Leadsom replied: "It would not be the optimal solution, obviously; it's definitely less than ideal. The UK would survive and thrive very well in all circumstances."
Meanwhile in the same magazine, Jeremy Hunt, the new Foreign Secretary, claimed the compromise deal, over which his predecessor Boris Johnson resigned, would be the “key to unlocking” the negotiations with Brussels
Declaring Mrs May’s plan was “absolutely alive,” he insisted it was, in fact, the “only way we can square the circle” between the EU’s red lines on protecting the four pillars of the single market and the UK’s in taking back control of its money, borders and laws.
In other developments:
*Labour’s Hilary Benn, who chairs the Commons Brexit Committee, claimed if Britain was on course for a no deal, then MPs would not allow that to happen but step in and "take control" of the Brexit process – although he did not elaborate how;
*Jim Harra, a senior official at HM Revenue and Customs, told a Lords committee that applying the Government’s proposed Facilitated Customs Arrangement could add £700 million a year to business costs – a fraction of the £20 billion a year a colleague suggested was the price-tag for Whitehall’s original “max-fac” option;
*John Manzoni, the Civil Service chief, told MPs: "We will be ready for a no deal Brexit. Not everything will be perfect";
*the European Commission urged the EU27 to “step up” preparations for a possible no-deal Brexit, warning of the possibility of long queues at borders and disruption at airports;
*Esther McVey, the Work and Pensions Secretary, failed publicly to say she had confidence in the Chequers Plan, preferring to say she had confidence the PM would “deliver the Brexit people voted for” and
*her partner, Yorkshire MP Philip Davies, became the third Tory to confirm he had submitted a letter of no confidence in Mrs May, saying he had lost trust in her ability to deliver Brexit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel