Scotland's independence day is "coming soon", Ian Blackford has claimed during a bad-tempered Commons debate.
The SNP's Westminster leader warned the Conservative Party's treatment of Scotland would accelerate separation, as he told of "real anger" among Scots at seeing Holyrood and their rights being "attacked" by the UK Government.
Mr Blackford reiterated fears over Scottish Parliament powers being taken away via Brexit legislation, which has resulted in ongoing parliamentary skirmishes in Westminster between the parties.
At one stage, Speaker John Bercow urged MPs to "lower the temperature" due to the ferocity of the heckling and shouting in the chamber.
The SNP's motion urges the Commons to endorse the principles of the Claim of Right for Scotland and acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of government "best suited to their needs".
Leading the debate, Mr Blackford said: "Is it very fitting today, Mr Speaker, that the Scottish National Party uses our opposition day (debate) on July 4 - independence day (in the United States) - to defend the interests and the rights and the will of the Scottish people?"
After being heckled by a Scottish Tory MP, Mr Blackford said: "Listen, it might not be independence day to you but I'll tell you this - the way the Conservative Party is treating Scotland, our independence day is coming and it's coming soon."
Labour's Ian Murray (Edinburgh South), intervening, said: "You say Scotland's independence is coming... the Scottish people did have a vote in 2014 and they agreed to stay in the United Kingdom."
Mr Blackford said there had been a change in circumstances, including Scotland's desire to stay in the EU while the UK Government wants to ignore them and "drive us" out of Europe.
He also railed against the "biggest power grab" conducted by Westminster since devolution in 1999, in a nod to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, which transfers EU law into UK law.
Only about 19 minutes were left for debate on devolution changes linked to the legislation when MPs considered amendments made by the House of Lords last month.
The Scottish Parliament did not grant a legislative consent motion for the key Brexit legislation, prompting claims the Sewel Convention had been ignored.
This is the precedent that Westminster must have the consent of Holyrood to legislate on devolved matters.
The UK Government has previously said the Act delivers "significant further powers" to the Scottish Parliament, and it would seek consent unless there are "not normal circumstances applying" - describing Brexit as such an exception.
Mr Blackford said "unknown territory" had been entered and urged the UK Government to bring forward legislation that protects the Scottish Parliament's powers.
He added: "If (Scottish Secretary David Mundell) recognises his role in defending devolution he should do so.
"A failure to do that should mean, quite frankly, he should resign because he is not standing up for the interests of Scotland."
Scottish Secretary David Mundell later said the SNP were guilty of "power-grab scaremongering, hot air and grandstanding stunts".
He said: "All we have now is manufactured grievances, they invent, they misrepresent, they abuse, they try to shout down those who disagree with them, they glory in childish stunts which embarrass the people they purport to represent."
Earlier Mr Mundell told MPs the debate told the public "everything about the SNP and their obsession with independence".
He said: "They're like a broken record, it's less than two years since Parliament debated a claim of right at the behest of the SNP.
"Of course in the intervening time we have had an electoral test in Scotland, a General Election, the result as I recall it was the SNP losing 21 seats and 12 Conservative gains.
"That debate was a charade then, an excuse to talk about independence and it's a charade today."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel