NICOLA Sturgeon’s reputation has been dented by a series of bad judgements culminating in the recent ditching of her new universities minister, a former SNP deputy leader has said.
Jim Sillars insisted the First Minister had “final responsibility” for vetting candidates and warned: “Once lost, a reputation for competence and judgement is hard to recover.”
Gillian Martin was dropped as minister for colleges, universities and science after just 24 hours last week when offensive comments she made in blog posts before she entered politics were highlighted.
In one, she mocked efforts to promote transgender rights, and made reference to “hairy knuckled lipstick-wearing transitional transgender Laydees”.
Writing in The Times, Mr Sillars said the first warnings over Ms Martin’s credentials were sounded on her election to Holyrood in 2016, when some of her past blog posts came to light.
Arguing a “prudent” First Minister would have insisted on checking whether further comments had been made, he added: “Two things are fatal to a senior politician: becoming a figure of mockery or when there is a general belief in a lack of judgment built up when that deficiency is apparent on important issues.
“Nicola Sturgeon is not subject to the first but open to an accusation of the latter.”
Mr Sillars, who was Alex Salmond’s deputy in the early 1990s, said Ms Sturgeon is fortunate she faces no serious rival for the top role, and insisted he was voicing in public what many were saying in private.
He argued the First Minister’s “walk on water” reputation started to disappear when she pushed for a second independence referendum in the aftermath of 2016’s Brexit vote.
He accused her of a “monumental misjudgement of what the result meant”, followed by a series of further bad decisions.
These included a “deliberate obstructive posture” in negotiations with Theresa May and allowing SNP members to believe the UK Government is attempting a “power grab” on Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel