BABY boxes were "fundamental" in cutting cot deaths among vulnerable babies in New Zealand but the high-sided design used in Scotland "has nothing to do with saving lives", one of the world's leading experts on infant mortality has said.
Professor Ed Mitchell said the deep Finnish-style design meant that parents would not be able to see or feel their baby if it was sleeping in the box in bed with them, unlike the shallower plastic Pepi-Pod or woven baby boxes given to some parents in New Zealand.
Read more: New row over safety standard of Scotland's baby boxes
Prof Mitchell, who was in Glasgow for the International Conference on Stillbirth, SIDS and Baby Survival, added that he "didn't see the point" in giving baby boxes to all families, regardless of wealth.
In a five-year period from 2010 to 2014, New Zealand cut cot deaths by 30 per cent. This coincided with the rollout of wahakura - woven baby boxes - and plastic pepi-pods, designed to make it safer for parents to bed-share with their baby, and to boost breastfeeding rates.
The initiative followed concerns about high rates of cot death in the Maori community in particular - which was five-fold that of Kiwis with European ancestry - partly because bed-sharing was a cultural norm.
Read more: Baby box rollout begins with aim to give every child 'best start'
The shallow-style baby boxes meant parents could still see their infant easily while sharing a bed, but would be blocked from rolling onto them.
Prof Mitchell, of the University of Auckland, said: "This has been fundamental. The biggest thing that happened is we stopped talking about [cot death] as something unavoidable or unpredictable.
"Accidental suffocation is preventable, and it's amazing how much of a difference that has made to being able to talk to parents about safe sleeping."
Read more: The battle to reduce to toll of infant deaths in Scotland goes on
However, he said Scotland's baby box policy was "very different".
He said: "The baby box that Scotland is getting is a nice gift for the family, but it has nothing to do with saving lives.
"With the pedi-pod or wahakura, the sides are so shallow you can reach around and see and feel the baby, although it's in a separate space.
"With the Finnish-style model used in Scotland, although it's been designed for babies to sleep in, the big high sides make it almost impossible for the parents to use it in bed with them so I don't think it's going to be beneficial in terms of reducing SUDI [sudden unexpected deaths in infancy]."
Prof Mitchell said the boxes should be targeted to at-risk infants. The risk of cot death is higher among babies whose mothers smoked in pregnancy, who are not breastfed, are low birth-weight and whose parents smoke, drink or abuse drugs.
Canadian academic Professor Karen Benzies said a programme in Alberta which provided vulnerable first-time parents with a Finnish-style baby box, parental education and mentoring had reduced rates of postnatal depression, but not cot deaths.
She criticised authorities - including some parts of North America - which had promoted baby boxes as a lone tool to cut infant mortality.
Prof Benzies said: "Until the evidence is clear, we should avoid distributing baby boxes alone, without concomitant health and social care supports, with the aim of reducing SUDI."
The Scottish Government has previously said its baby box offers a safe sleeping place when used in accordance with other safe sleeping practices.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel