A MEDIC at the centre of a botched delivery which saw a premature baby decapitated in the womb "does not present a risk to patients" and will not face sanctions.
Dr Vaishnavy Laxman's fitness to practise is not impaired by misconduct and the tragedy was "an isolated, single incident in an otherwise unblemished career", a tribunal has found.
Read more: Doctor in baby tragedy 'should have performed C-section', tribunal finds
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) said it was "not necessary" to impose a warning against Dr Laxman's registration as a result of the incident, which occurred at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on March 16 2014.
The MPTS said it was also revoking existing restrictions which ban her from working in obstetrics without supervision.
However, the tribunal heard that while Dr Laxman continues to practise as a gynaecologist, she had already voluntarily given up obstetrics.
Although the tribunal found that Dr Laxman's had been wrong to attempt a vaginal delivery instead of a caesarean section, it concluded that the complications plaguing the birth meant there was "a significant risk that [the infant] would not have survived regardless of the mode of delivery".
Read more: Baby's head 're-attached' after decapitation so that mother could say goodbye
The tribunal heard how the mother's waters had broken early, at 25 weeks, and Dr Laxman had tried to deliver the baby boy naturally despite a number of complications - including an abnormally low heart rate, prolapsed umbilical cord and being in the breech position.
Crucially, the mother's cervix was only 4cm (two inches) dilated. The tribunal found that Dr Laxman should have carried out a C-section given the risk of the boy's head being trapped in the birth canal, but accepted that she "genuinely believed" a vaginal delivery was in the mother and baby's best interests.
Read more: Medics 'should not be prosecuted' for mistakes that kill patients
The tribunal heard how the baby's head became stuck during delivery and that he was decapitated when Dr Laxman pulled on his legs and torso. The head had to be retrieved by C-section and re-attached.
However, the tribunal stressed that while Dr Laxman's decision to proceed with a vaginal delivery "contributed to the decapitation", it had not "caused or contributed" to the infant's death as he was already dead prior to being decapitated.
As a result, the tribunal "did not find that Dr Vilvanathan Laxman’s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct".
The determination said Dr Laxman had "learnt from this unfortunate episode" and "the likelihood of it being repeated is extremely remote".
It added: "Even good doctors can make mistakes and that it is sometimes a consequence of the field in which they are practising that the results of their mistakes can be significant...Nothing in this determination should detract from the fact that on March 16 2014 Dr Vilvanathan Laxman made a significant error of judgement which had serious consequences and a profound impact upon [the mother] and for which Dr Vilvanathan Laxman bears a heavy responsibility."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel