SCHOOLS which are using extra money to help close the attainment gap on campus police officers have come under fire.
The row blew up after a Scottish Parliament committee heard examples of how schools were spending the Pupil Equity Fund (PEF).
Martin Canavan, policy officer at the Aberlour Child Care Trust, said it was an illustration of “a real inconsistency” surrounding PEF.
He told the education committee: “Where there are good relationships with schools, where headteachers are quite proactive, then PEF is a really good model.
“Where there is a need to support teachers, to support schools, to recognise what’s happening, then PEF doesn’t necessarily present or provide the best model.
“It could result in money being spent on things that maybe don’t work, aren’t evidenced to work, and what is essentially a very valuable resource could be otherwise not used as best it could be.”
Mr Canavan said the example of campus police officers had caused particular concern.
He added: “We’re not entirely convinced as an organisation in terms of the work that we do ... that campus police officers are a particularly good use of PEF funding.
“That’s not to say there isn’t a role for police in schools ... but when it’s uniformed police officers patrolling school campuses we’re not entirely sure that’s an appropriate use of PEF funding.”
However, the decision was defended by John Butcher, executive director of education at North Ayrshire Council, who acknowledged that some schools in the local authority had chosen to spend part of their PEF funding on campus officers.
Headteachers from Glasgow have also chosen to spend the money in this way under a partnership with Police Scotland.
Mr Butcher said the initiative was “breaking down some of the barriers between Police Scotland and local authorities and children and young people”.
He added: “Campus officers don’t patrol schools is the bottom line. They don’t actually wander about the schools in their uniforms.
“They are involved in Duke of Edinburgh’s awards. Campus officers take some of those clubs, they are involved in wider achievements ... they are involved fully in the life of the schools.
“They encourage young people to be part of the school, to get into school in the morning, they work with parents to break down those barriers between police, between schools and to encourage those parents to send their children to school to get that involvement.
“There is a long history of campus officers both in Glasgow and in my own authority and they are not there to police the schools, they are there to be absolutely a key partner in the schools.”
The Scottish Government’s PEF scheme hands funding directly to schools and headteachers to spend on initiatives aimed at closing the poverty-related attainment gap, with £120 million distributed in 2017/18.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here