A former finance director at Prestwick Airport has claimed he was sacked for exposing allegations of fraud, bribery and collusion at the state-owned site.
Derek Banks claims he told bosses about potential corruption within its procurement process and was dismissed soon after for blowing the whistle.
The allegations, which were exposed at an employment tribunal hearing, include claims a third party acting on behalf of the airport kept its relationship with a bidder for runway resurfacing work a secret.
READ MORE: RBS accused of ‘historic betrayal’ as chief defends branch closures
It also emerged that the same contractor had sought bids for work "in excess of the airport's requirements".
Mr Banks, 50, from East Kilbride, has lodged claims with the tribunal for unfair dismissal and being treated unfairly for making a public interest disclosure.
The hearing in Glasgow yesterday was told that Mr Banks submitted a report to airport bosses detailing his concerns in March this year and also asked for an audit to look at any impropriety.
However, his audit request was refused and he was dismissed a month later.
Airport officials claim he was dismissed because of poor performance, but Mr Banks's position is that there were no issues with his work before he spoke up on the allegations.
The airport's non-executive chair Andrew Miller told the hearing that he received the report and agreed it included claims of potential fraud, bribery, collusion and conflicts of interest.
Mr Bank's Solicitor Ingrid McGhee put it to Mr Miller that it showed that the third party, Halcion Ltd, had not been honest about its links to bidder Breedon Aggregates.
Asked if the report concerned him, he said: "Yes it did concern me, but we took the party out and rescored them and they still would have won the contract irrespective of what we subsequently found out."
READ MORE: SNP ministers spent £400,000 on doomed Saltire Prize
He was also asked if it concerned him that what was asked by Halcion was "far higher than what was required". He replied it did.
Miss McGhee asked: "Are you willing to confirm if the allegations of fraud, collusion, bribery and conflicts of interest in respect of the runway resurfacing matter were confirmed?"
Mr Miller replied: "Conflict of interests, yes. Collusion, maybe. But fraud and bribery, no."
The tribunal heard that Mr Banks also made a number of claims involving misuse of the procurement process by the airport's operations director Jules Matteoni and allegations of expenses misconduct by HR director Sonia Rafferty, who denied any wrongdoing on her part.
However, Mr Miller argued that Mr Banks was sacked because of a "lack of engagement within in the business and poor stewardship".
He also said the airport had concerns about Mr Banks's involvement with a female member of staff.
The tribunal heard that an email passed between Mr Miller and the airport's chief executive Stewart Adams said that Mr Banks was "not a team player" and had undermined his colleagues.
It also stated that other directors had given him the nickname "devious Derek".
READ MORE: Loss-making Prestwick Airport touting for business at military fairs across the US
In her closing submission in the hearing - which was to decide if Mr Banks should be allowed to keep his job until a decision is made in his case - Ms McGhee said that when her client raised concerns about Ms Rafferty and Mr Matteoni, Mr Miller told him to "back off Sonia and Jules".
She also claims he was told that a "nail with its head showing will have it knocked off" and from that point on Mr Banks felt his "card was marked".
The lawyer added that Halcion had not been "open and transparent about their relationship with a prospective tender" and that this had a "financial benefit to [Halcion] and Breedon".
She said: "The claimant held a reasonable belief that there was potential collusion, fraud and bribery being carried out by Halcion on behalf of the respondent."
Ms McGhee added: "No other person was actively tackling these issues within the respondents and the claimant ultimately paid the price for doing so with his career."
Brian Campbell, the lawyer acting for the airport, said that many of the claims made by Mr Banks were not protected disclosures.
He also claimed that the director was not the original source of the claims about the Halcion and Breedon contracting issue.
READ MORE: Fracking not banned after all, SNP government tells court
Mr Campbell said there was "no apparent credible motive why he would be dismissed for his part in the investigation".
The lawyer added that Mr Banks was ultimately dismissed because of "his perceived lack of engagement in his role and poor performance".
A decision on whether or not Mr Banks will be allowed to keep his job in the interim will be issued at a later date by employment judge Shona MacLean.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel