SNP and Labour MPs have accused the Government of doing too little, too slowly to reform Scotland’s notorious limited partnerships or SLPs.
Conservative ministers this week outlined proposed new reforms of such firms, which are used as secrecy vehicle for money-laundering and corruption. Their ideas secured a cautious welcome from campaigners but will now have to go through detailed scrutiny and consultation.
Opposition MPs on Wednesday tried to force the government to act faster by supporting an SNP amendment to the money-laundering bill making the partners of SLPs have UK bank accounts.
However, that bid failed thanks to opposition from Conservatives and the DUP.
Writing in today’s Herald, the MP who proposed the amendment, Alison Thewliss, said the government had effectively announced “a consultation on a consultation”. She added: “While all this has been going on, money laundering through SLPs has continued unabated. The UK Government had an opportunity this week to accept our amendments and strengthen regulation, which they shamefully ducked.
“They must now bring forward a timetable with real actions if they are serious about tackling the scourge of dirty money on our doorstep.”
Labour's Anneliese Dodds MP said: “The Government are continuing to show a complete misunderstanding of what measures are needed to stop criminals laundering money through SLPS. Opposition Parties have been calling for reform of these shady corporate structures for years, while the Government have voted against our amendments each and every time. The Government have a record or announcing consultations that drag on for years without any outcome.”
Anneliese Dodds
A spokesman for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy defended reforms saying legitimate business had to be protected.
He said: “The UK is leading the global fight against money laundering and changes to the law last year have seen a substantial drop in the abuse of these financial arrangements.
“It was right we carefully developed these latest reforms to further cut these crimes but without harming the legitimate businesses and pensions that invest through partnerships.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here