Theresa May’s plans for Brexit have been dealt further blows after a fresh wave of defeats in the House of Lords.
Here, we look at what it means for the Government:
– So, what headache for the Government have peers caused this time?
The Lords voted by a majority of 91 to give Parliament a decisive say on the outcome of the Brexit negotiations.
#HouseofLords votes 202 for, 260 against amendment on referendum on negotiations before withdrawal, so change to the #EUWithdrawalBill is not made. Watch for more https://t.co/yq5cNXOlT2 pic.twitter.com/lKA6KvW2Nz
— House of Lords (@UKHouseofLords) April 30, 2018
– What does it mean for the Prime Minister’s exit strategy?
It would put an end to Mrs May’s position that the UK will leave the EU with no deal if MPs reject the final package she secures. The Government says it would weaken the UK’s hand in negotiations with Brussels and could even give Parliament the power to delay the UK’s exit from the European Union indefinitely.
– Did any Conservative peers rebel?
Some 19 Tories rebelled, including former fronthbenchers Lord Heseltine, Lord Patten of Barnes and Lord Willetts. They say the country’s future should be determined by Parliament rather than the Government.
#HouseofLords votes 270 for, 233 against amendment on parliamentary mandate for negotiating Brexit deal, so change to the #EUWithdrawalBill is made. Watch for more https://t.co/vxrXlAbCPG pic.twitter.com/m1t7B19ydR
— House of Lords (@UKHouseofLords) April 30, 2018
– What happens next?
The amendment to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill will go to the Commons to be voted on by MPs. The Government will seek to overturn the result and Tory Remainers will face intense pressure to fall into line.
– Was it the only defeat peers inflicted on the Government?
It was the first of three on Monday evening. They also supported a move to give Parliament approval of the mandate for negotiations over the UK’s future relationship with the EU and backed a post-Brexit system that enables lone child refugees to join family members living in the UK.
It takes the tally overall to nine defeats, with ministers seeing off just two challenges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here