A ROW has broken out over controversial plans to push forward with an “experimental” cull of hundreds of ravens.
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) has granted a group of farmers and gamekeepers a five-year licence to kill 300 birds in Perthshire.
But RSPB Scotland has now claimed the scheme has little to do with protecting wading birds, as claimed – and is instead a thinly veiled attempt to get rid of a perceived pest to benefit grouse shooting estates.
It said it was “outraged” to learn a licence had been given to Strathbraan Community for Waders, which says it represents “some of the local land management…and private interests in the area who value wading birds for their biodiversity, social and economic value to the area and to Scotland more widely.”
The charity said the location should have “set some alarm bells ringing” at SNH, due to its appalling track record as a site known for the illegal persecution of raptors.
Golden eagles and other protected species have suspiciously vanished in the vicinity, and police are currently probing the disappearance of a satellite-tagged white tailed eagle nearby.
In an online blog, the RSPB requested the licence be halted, adding: "In the first instance, we doubt very much that the proposal in this case has anything to do with the given reason for the research licence request – ostensibly to ‘improve understanding of factors affecting key wader species’.
“In light of previous loud complaints by estates in this and other grouse shooting areas about raven predation of red grouse, we and many others see this raven research proposal as simply a rather transparent mechanism whereby a perceived pest species can be removed to benefit red grouse, with the conservation of wading birds as a by-product.”
It added: “It worries us a good deal that SNH apparently do not seem to have taken any of this contextual information into account as part of this licensing decision.”
The conservation charity also poured cold water on claims ravens are to blame for the plummeting populations of wading birds, such as the curlew, redshank and the lapwing.
It said an academic study co-funded by SNH previously found ravens – which were persecuted by gamekeepers for centuries – should not be held responsible.
And it insisted the Perthshire licence was granted “with what appears to be some effort to exclude local organisations and individuals” who could have provided expert advice.
But the Scottish Moorland Group, which represents landowners, rural businesses and rural professionals, insisted the cull was a “pragmatic approach”.
It said that while the number of wading birds had dropped by 62 per cent in 20 years, raven populations have ballooned by 134 per cent.
Robbie Kernahan, SNH Head of Wildlife, said the license was about a “pressing and complex conservation issue”.
He said: “It is a large-scale collaborative trial which will help improve our understanding of factors affecting key wader species, populations of which are declining at an alarming rate.
“We know that predation can affect wader populations and that ravens have a role in this which is worthy of further investigation. We need to update this research and the Strathbraan licence application will help facilitate this through the collaboration established in the area.”
He insisted controls were in place to ensure there will be no impact on the conservation status of ravens, adding: “We understand the concerns over wildlife crime in Strathbraan, but we are also clear that the granting of this licence is wholly unconnected to the issues concerned.”
He continued: “If it becomes apparent that actions are not being carried out in accordance with the terms of any licence then we will have no hesitation in removing the licence.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel