President Donald Trump has said that although he is looking ahead optimistically to a historic summit meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un he could still pull out if he feels it is “not going to be fruitful”.
Mr Trump said that CIA director Mike Pompeo and Mr Kim “got along really well” in their recent secret meeting, and he declared, “We’ve never been in a position like this” to address worldwide concerns over North Korea’s nuclear weapons.
But speaking alongside Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, after the allies met at Mr Trump’s Florida resort, he made clear that he would still be ready to pull the plug on what is being billed as an extraordinary meeting between the leaders of longtime adversaries.
“If I think that if it’s a meeting that is not going to be fruitful we’re not going to go. If the meeting when I’m there is not fruitful I will respectfully leave the meeting,” Mr Trump told a news conference. He also said that a US-led “maximum pressure” campaign of tough economic sanctions on North Korea would continue until the isolated nation “denuclearises.”
Mr Abe echoed the sentiment.
“Just because North Korea is responding to dialogue, there should be no reward. Maximum pressure should be maintained,” he said.
Mr Trump has said his summit with Mr Kim, with whom he traded bitter insults and threats last year as North Korea conducted nuclear and missile tests, could take place by early June, although the venue has yet to be decided. It would be the first such leadership summit between the two nations after six decades of hostility following the Korean War.
Other than the threat posed to by North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction, another issue overhanging the summit plans is the fate of three Americans detained there. Mr Trump said that was under negotiation and there was a “good chance” of winning their release, but he would not say whether that was a precondition for sitting down with Mr Kim.
Mr Pompeo raised the question of the three Americans in his meeting with Mr Kim, a US official said.
Mr Trump also said he had promised Mr Abe he would work hard for the return of Japanese nationals abducted by North Korea. Tokyo says at least a dozen Japanese said to have been taken in the 1970s and 1980s remain unaccounted for.
News of Mr Pompeo’s trip to North Korea, which took place more than two weeks ago, emerged on Tuesday, as politicians weighed whether he should be confirmed to become secretary of state.
Mr Trump and Republican senators held up his highly unusual, secret mission as sign of Mr Pompeo’s diplomatic ability. But the prospect of his confirmation hung in the balance as Democrats lined up against him.
Senator Robert Menendez, top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that will have the first vote on confirmation, expressed frustration that the CIA chief had not briefed him on the visit that took place more than a week before Mr Pompeo’s public hearing last Thursday.
He is the most senior US official to meet with a North Korean leader since Secretary of State Madeleine Albright met with Mr Kim’s father in Pyongyang in 2000.
“Now I don’t expect diplomacy to be negotiated out in the open, but I do expect for someone who is the nominee to be secretary of state, when he speaks with committee leadership and is asked specific questions about North Korea, to share some insights about such a visit,” Mr Menendez said at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
The committee is expected to vote on the nomination next week. Mr Pompeo, whose hawkish foreign policy views and comments about minorities have raised Democratic hackles, would replace Rex Tillerson who was pushed out by Trump last month.
In the US Senate, Republicans have a single-vote advantage on the 21-member panel that will have the first say on Mr Pompeo’s nomination. With nine of the 10 Democrats already declaring they will oppose Mr Pompeo, and at least one Republican, Rand Paul of Kentucky, also opposed, the panel could be forced to take the unusual step of sending the nomination to the full Senate without a favourable recommendation.
Trump said Wednesday he expects Paul to come through on Pompeo. The president called Paul and the senator agreed to meet with Pompeo, but Paul’s spokesman said, “Nothing else has changed.”
As for opposition by Democrats, Republican Cory Gardner, who chairs an Asia subcommittee, said in an interview that they “want to play partisan politics”.
Despite meeting Mr Pompeo on Tuesday, Gardner said he had not been briefed on the trip and was awaiting more information about it.
Still, he said the fact that the meeting happened gave weight to Mr Pompeo’s testimony last week that the administration was committed to the “complete and verifiable denuclearisation” of North Korea and sustaining sanctions pressure.
It is not unprecedented for US intelligence officials to serve as conduits for communication with Pyongyang.
In 2014, the then-director of US national intelligence, James Clapper, secretly visited North Korea to bring back two American detainees.
MR Clapper did not, however, meet with Mr Kim, who has only in recent weeks emerged from international seclusion after taking power six years ago and super-charging North Korea’s push to become a nuclear power. Mr Kim met last month with China’s president and is to meet South Korea’s leader April 27.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel