Concerns have been raised about the number of pregnant women who have served short-term prison sentences in the last five years.
Figures obtained by the Liberal Democrats show that since 2013 there have been 104 pregnant women in jail.
Of these, 37 were given sentences of less than 12 months and 31 gave birth while behind bars.
The party's justice spokesman, Liam McArthur, urged the Scottish Government to press ahead with its plan to introduce a presumption against jail sentences of less than 12 months.
He said: "The fact that 37 expectant mothers have been given destructive short-term sentences in recent years should have alarm bells ringing.
"All the evidence shows that short-term sentences don't work and are less effective than robust community-based disposals in reducing reoffending.
"Rates of reoffending amongst those who have served short stints in prison are sky high.
"That is why Scottish Liberal Democrats have consistently urged the Scottish Government to introduce a presumption against sentences of less than 12 months, something ministers now accept would be a positive step.
"If, in the process, it means more pregnant women pay for any crime they have committed through robust means short of prison then that has to be in everyone's interests."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Reducing the use of ineffective short-term imprisonment, and increasing the use of robust community sentences, is part of our smarter approach to tackling offending.
"That is why we have announced our intention to extend the presumption against short custodial sentences from three months to 12 months or less.
"Our new female custodial estate is designed to support family contact. Dedicated mother and baby facilities will be provided in the national facility, HMP Grampian, and both community custodial units for those women who need them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel