AN increasingly acrimonious split in the independence movement over the date of a second referendum has forced an SNP MP to call for calm after being subject to online abuse.
Pete Wishart said he had been called a Unionist “poster boy” and an “Etonian boot licker” by fellow Nationalists after urging pragmatism, rather than rushing into a new vote.
He said he had been taken aback by the “vehemence" of people he presumed were political colleagues, and admitted the Yes campaign had a problem with online abuse.
Revealed: SNP's new blueprint for independence
The Perthshire MP, who is chair of the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee, wrote about the attacks on his blog in an article entitled “We must conduct our debate with respect”.
He said: “It would be easy to dismissed this as ‘just Twitter’ but I know that environment reasonably well and I have to conclude we might have an issue and difficulty in our movement.”
He added: “Shouting people down, name calling and misrepresenting people’s views will not help anybody. If this happens people with legitimate views will be silenced and discouraged in coming forward with their own views.
“No one in our movement has all the answers and at this juncture in the fight for our nation’s independence we need as much input and ideas as possible.
“I will certainly not be deterred from forcefully speaking my mind and I will not be silenced.
“I will continue to put forward what I think is right for my country and right for the case in securing our nation’s independence.”
Paul Hutcheon: Yes movement is heading for a rift on the economics of independence
After calling a second referendum a year ago, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon “reset” her plan in the wake of the SNP losing a third of its MPs in the June election.
She is due to update MSPs on "the precise timescale for offering people a choice over the country’s future” in the autumn.
Some Yes campaigners argue she is duty bound to use the “triple lock” mandate she sought and - by her own benchmark - achieved in the general election to push for a new vote.
However senior party figures, including former Justice Secretary Kenneth MacAskill and Mr Wishart, say it would be folly to have a referendum without clear public support for Yes.
A new poll on Sunday found most Scots opposed both a referendum and independence.
Mr Wishart, the SNP’s longest-serving MP, last week wrote an article in iScot magazine saying it would be a “national tragedy” to hold a referendum before the country was supportive, and defeat would set the independence cause back “decades”.
He said his general election experience was that the push for a fresh plebiscite had alienated many voters, and resulted in the Tories slashing his majority from about 10,000 to just 21.
Iain Macwhirter: Why the future spells double trouble for Nicola Sturgeon
Mr Wishart said his “crime” or urging pragmatism had unleashed “the most extraordinary response on Twitter” and led him to question how the Yes movement debated the issue.
He said he was accused of being “defeatist”, of “depressing” the Yes movement, and of being too settled in his Westminster lifestyle.
He revealed similar abuse had been a factor in not seeking the SNP deputy leadership, and appealed for unity in the Yes camp.
“I was concerned that the debate might descend into what I have just experienced and I didn’t want our contest dominated with all of this,” he said.
Labour MSP Rhoda Grant said: "This is an extraordinary and welcome intervention by Pete Wishart. For years, politicians from across the political spectrum have been warning about the scale of abuse they face, particularly on social media.
"Personal abuse and insults should have no place in political debate - and it is essential politicians themselves lead the way.
"It is essential elected members from all parties, as well as the wider public, work together to tackle abuse on social media."
READ MORE: Devolution overhaul essential because of Brexit, experts warn
A Tory spokesman said: “Pete Wishart is stating the obvious. As one of the Yes campaign’s most erratic Twitter users, perhaps he should look in the mirror when looking for blame.”
Labour and the Tories have also had problems with online abuse.
The SNP is due to publish its new prospectus for independence imminently, after an 18-month study by its Growth Commission.
However the Sunday Herald reported this could back a centre-right free market New Zealand model, rather than the centre-left Scandinavian model backed by many in the Yes movement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel