A final day surge has meant almost 10,000 firms across the UK have posted their gender pay gap figures.
By 7pm, with just a few hours to go to the midnight deadline, the UK Government website recorded some 9,931 companies had submitted their figures as required by law. This exceeds the official expected estimate of 9,000.
It meant that more than 1,000 firms submitted their numbers in the last 24 hours. Such was the volume of traffic on the official portal that at one point on Wednesday morning it crashed.
Any company with 250 or more staff has had to file their figures or face the prospect of an unlimited fine.
The published data suggests 78 per cent of companies pay men more than women, 13 per cent pay women more than men while eight per cent have no gender pay gap based on the median measure.
Ahead of the deadline, Theresa May vowed to tackle the "burning injustice" of the gender pay gap.
The Prime Minister compared the pay gap to the women's suffrage movement a century ago, saying "major injustices still hold too many women back".
Her colleague Baroness Williams, the Home Office Minister, said she expected businesses to comply with the requirement to report their figures before the midnight deadline, noting: "It's a bit like tax returns; probably a lot of organisations will do it at the last minute."
Asked how companies could be pressed to publish a further document to show what they were planning to do to address their gender pay gap, Lady Williams said: "We are actually encouraging them to say what they will do…
“Some of the pressure will come from society but also from within those organisations themselves.
"Organisations actually want to do this. They really are trying to have a more gender equal workforce. I don't think we're actually pushing up against a closing door. This is something people want to see," she added.
Labour's Harriet Harman, a lifelong campaigner for women’s rights, said the pay transparency was "stripping away the veil and showing the pay discrimination".
The former party deputy leader noted: "What we've got is a pay structure which reflects how it used to be and not how it should be, which is that an hour of a woman's work is no less valuable than an hour of a man's work."
The London MP added: "What has to change is now we've got these figures published the management have to set targets for making progress year on year and they must be stretching targets, because nobody's interested in the justification, the excuses, the reasons anymore, actually it needs to change."
Hannah Bardell for the SNP said the publication of companies’ gender pay gap figures was “a start” but showed there was a “huge amount of work still to be done”.
The Livingston MP is one of a group of cross-party MPs supporting the #paymetoo campaign, set up to help ensure women don’t get “shut down” when asking about the gender pay gap at their workplace.
She noted: “In some cases the gender pay gap is enormous; rising to over 70 per cent. These figures are of course unacceptable and show the huge amount of work still to be done.”
Ms Bardell added: “Identifying the gender pay gap is a step forward. This must be translated into a real commitment by employers to get rid of this lingering injustice and ensure that every company and workplace has equality.
“It’s not just good for society; we know it is good for business and leads to better decision-making and higher profitability.’’
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here