A SCOTS Labour MP at the centre of a race row was given £3000 by a union campaigning against racism just 48 hours after he had to apologise for “deeply offensive” remarks.
The Communication Workers Union (CWU) has been heavily criticised for making the donation to Hugh Gaffney while it was promoting an anti-racism conference.
At a Burns Supper last month, the former postman had referred to the Bard not being “bent” and called a Chinese meal a “chinky”.
SNP minister Humza Yousaf said CWU’s action was “beyond belief” and urged Mr Gaffney to donate the money to an anti-racism charity.
Mr Gaffney, 54, a close friend of Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard, was elected the MP for Coatbridge, Chryston & Bellshill in last year’s snap general election.
READ MORE: Racism row MP Hugh Gaffney apologises unreservedly to constituents
On February 7, the Herald revealed he had admitted using “deeply offensive and unacceptable” language during a student Burns Supper speech three days earlier.
He offered his “unreserved apologies” to the LGBT and Chinese communities, and said he would take part in equality and diversity training.
Despite widespread coverage of Mr Gaffney’s apology, the CWU gave him the £3000 donation two days later on February 9, according to the MP’s updated register of interests.
At the time, the CWU was advertising and supporting the Stand Up to Racism Trade Union Conference which was held in London the following day, February 10.
Mr Yousaf, who has repeatedly criticised Labour for failing to tackle racism in its ranks, told the Herald: “We know the CWU are closely aligned to Richard Leonard, and now it transpires they’ve backed Hugh Gaffney to the tune of thousands of pounds just 48 hours after he made these deeply offensive remarks, adding insult to injury.
"How the CWU could sanction this support after he was exposed as a bigot is beyond belief, especially while they're talking up their own credentials in tackling racism.
“Perhaps in light of these fresh revelations, the CWU might finally confirm whether Hugh Gaffney ever underwent diversity training in his previous role as a union rep.
“So far their silence is deafening. The best approach would be for Mr Gaffney not to pocket a penny of this cash - and hand it over to an anti-racism charity.”
Mr Gaffney, a CWU member who says he is on an unpaid five-year "career break" from the Royal Mail while an MP, also received £4000 from the union towards his election campaign.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour under pressure over failure to suspend shamed MP over racist and homophobic comments
In last year’s Scottish Labour leadership contest, the CWU endorsed Mr Leonard and donated £5000 to his campaign against Anas Sarwar.
The CWU did not respond to a request for comment.
Ms Gaffney did not respond to calls and email.
A Scottis
Mr Leonard yesterday denied his party has a problem with racism after more accusations were levelled against shamed Dumfries & Galloway councillor Jim Dempster.
Mr Dempster, suspended last week after a remark about Mr Yousaf in a burka, was alleged to have used racist taunts to two other people.
A brother and sister claimed Mr Dempster had racially abused them in the 1980s and 1990s when he ran the village newsagents in Sanquhar.
The woman claimed Mr Dempster had called her a “chocolate monkey” as a young child and chased her with an air freshener saying she smelled of curry.
The man claimed Mr Dempster had called him “Jew boy” because he knew as a Muslim he would be circumcised and said he still felt “haunted” by the remarks.
Mr Dempster vehemently denied the allegations.
READ MORE: Fresh claims of racial abuse against Labour councillor
Mr Leonard said: “We [Scottish Labour] have got no more of a problem with racism than Scottish society as a whole.
“I am impatient and I am angry that we are receiving complaints and they will need to be dealt with thoroughly and timeously.
"There will be zero tolerance of racism and Islamophobia inside the Scottish Labour Party.”
He said of Mr Dempster: “He is denying the allegations that were made today so he will have an opportunity to put forward his side of the story and that will form part of the investigation.
Mr Dempster said: “I absolutely refute and deny the [new] allegations made against me.
“The language and behaviour alleged does not represent me, or how I conducted myself.
"It is a matter of public record that I did not purchase the shop until May 1991. This must call into question the veracity of the allegation.”
A Scottish Labour spokesman said: "“These donations are permissible and reported in line with the statutory requirements."
Mr Gaffney and the CWU were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel