BREXIT poses “serious challenges” to NHS funding, staffing and patient care rather than the £350 million-a-week boon its advocates claimed, according to a new report.
Leaving the EU next year also means a reduction in reciprocal patient rights abroad and delays in the approval of medicines, the UK in a Changing Europe think tank said.
Its 'Brexit and the NHS' report said existing funding pressures on the health service could intensify as the economy was hit, with knock-on effects on waiting times, recovery rates and care quality.
With around 200,000 EU nationals working in the health and social care sector, particularly in London, south east England and Northern Ireland, fewer staff could lead to skills shortages.
In devolved areas, the report warned several Scottish health projects could see their funding dry up after they lost their current income under the Interreg scheme.
Cross-border health treatments in Ireland, with patients travelling between the North and the Republic for services, could also be affected.
Treatment of sexual health, diabetes and eating disorders is currently integrated across the border, but in future patients could have to travel farther to obtain the same treatment.
Other areas flagged by the report as potential losers include patient data sharing, pharmaceutical monitoring and approvals, clinical trials, health research grants, and rapid alert systems for human tissues and blood.
Think tank director Professor Anand Menon said: “This report shows the UK’s future relationship with the EU will play a critical role in the health and well-being of the country.
"Our aim has been to make clear the potential challenges so they can be anticipated and appropriate action taken.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel