BREXIT risks leaving Scotland more vulnerable to the threat of tobacco industry lobbying, it has been warned.
ASH Scotland – a charity which aims to combat the harm caused by smoking – said global tobacco giants could exploit economic arguments to gain influence.
But it also argued the UK’s exit from the European Union could make it easier to introduce minimum tobacco pricing or even limit the amount supplied in the UK.
Giving evidence to a Holyrood committee, the charity said: “More generally, there is the risk that the UK could be more vulnerable to the threat of tobacco industry lobbying, particularly in a hard Brexit focused on deregulation.
“This could take the form of an economic argument – as two of the four largest transnational tobacco companies (British American Tobacco and Imperial Tobacco) are based in the UK, they may seek to argue that their economic contribution should outweigh their disastrous impact on world health, particularly in the event of significant economic changes after leaving the UK.
“In light of the devastating impact of tobacco on human health and well-being – and the attendant costs of healthcare – this argument should be dismissed.”
ASH Scotland said leaving the single market could remove restrictions on market interventions, making it easier to introduce minimum pricing.
It said opportunities for importing tobacco without paying UK duty could also be reduced.
The charity added: “It must be recognised explicitly in any trade deal that public health measures in general and tobacco control measures in particular are legitimate health policies, whether or not they affect the financial returns of industry.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel